Christine Treguier on Mon, 27 Mar 2000 02:21:43 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] France again |
Decision of the french supreme court of appeal : no prescrition on Internet On march 21the supreme court rejected the "pourvoi en cassation" of french artist Jean Louis Costes, who was contesting a decision of the court of appeal against him; the court had judged that on Internet, the contents cannot be restricted by prescription, because it is assimilated to "continuous publishing". These decisions are serious threats to freedom of expression in France : the decision is going against the actual constant legislation : it is the first time a judge is contesting the principle according to which expression offenses are instantaneous offenses and a prescription delay has to be calculated from the publication date. The principle establishing that an author cannot be sued for a content after a 3 months delay after publishing, is one of the foundations of freedom of expression since the 19th century. At the beginning of Napolean reign it was three years. immediately after, it felt to three months. It has never been interrupted since then, except during nazi occupation and Vichy. The objective was to protect authors from beeing sued ad infinitum, a form of persecution and pressure which would equal censorship. The benefits of prescription have been enlarged to all medias, without exception, as they appeared. Logically it should apply to Internet. The backlash is extremely serious : authors and persons responsibles for contents ( a very sensible notion at the moment in France) will be permanently under threat of trials which will lead them to ruin and closing of any "disturbing" site and to self-censorship of those who will accept the rules (strange... I wrote that already an hour ago). The threat is also on all the cultural, heritage, historical and informationnal contents, as soon as they will be published on the Net. There will be some individuals, associations or public services to dislike part of them and sue them, no matter if they were published eight hundred years ago and they belong to public domain. A bit of history on the case : Costes is an undergournd performer and musician, well know for, to make short, pointing at the society's disfunctionnings through "pornographic parodies". he was sued two years ago by a jewish students association (AEIJF) claiming his lyrics published on the Net were nazi and incitations to racial hate. He was condemned, cast appeal, and went to supreme court because of the non prescription decision risks a jail penalty of two years, a X hundred thousands francs of fine, the closing of his site and... a two years probation period during which he would be forbidden to produce similar artpieces. More on http://costes.org _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold