ova.kill on 3 Aug 2000 14:34:53 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] my mail iz stalled |
this is the last mail i've recieved 4m the nettime bold list, and can't get 3 the website... is it gettin thru? At 11:34 AM 29/07/00 MDT, you wrote: >spread my hopes thin >>Craig Brozefsky <craig@red-bean.com> wrote: >>"jen Hui Bon Hoa" <epistrophy@yifan.net> writes: >spare my scars again >> My question: Is the formula really ‘patent or be patented’? >> Could your work really be copyrighted by someone else? Perhaps this >> is why ted byfield copyrights his texts (is that right, ted?). This >> is why I would consider copyrighting my own production. >this is why we should/would consider consuming ourselves again, all my >publications are savory >stitch up my smiles again >close down my sales again >we are rising so >we are alarming >on screen >we see >the terrorific pleasures of our own consumption > >kno(c)ontroling the konversations >all channels open >laid down bare wires and life lines >calling out reaching empires of [kno] >your enemies > >(is that alright?) > >------------------------------------------------------------------- >With copyrights, any work you produce is automagically copyrighted. >You need not apply, register, or do anything, not even write >"Copyrighted by Craig Brozefsky" on it. If you don't want it >copyrighted you must explicitely put it into the public domain, or die >and then wait 70 years. Obviously the latter solution is not going to >be practical for a prolific artist seeking to avoid the taint of the >IP regime. >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >With any work you produce is already consumed. >-------------------------------------------------------------- >> Even if I leave my work uncopyrighted and I manage to escape this >> sort of wholesale appropriation (well, there would be no commercial >> incentive to take away the rights to my work: I have seen nothing to >> show that it is particularly lucrative, ahem), I still want to be >> able to monitor how my work is used. I do not want it to be >------------------------------------------------- >...we still want to believe...to be...the nineteenth cent. artists we lost >when they abandoned us to the flux of recent histories...kept alive and kept >alight. >-------------------- >> appropriated by and for causes to which I am personally in >> ideological opposition. >---------------- >all the bodyminds gathered here agree to be in limited opposition to the >undersigned idealouge >------------------------------------ >In the U.S. at least the copyright regime recognizes no such >priveledge for the artist. >------------------------- >(other priveledges go unsaid) >------------------------- >You're granted a monopoly on the >reproduction of your work soley because it gives you an economic >incentive to release it to the public and advance the sciences and the >arts. No magical connection between author and work is recognized. >------------------------------------------------------------------ >I don't think you intended this desire of yours to be codified in law >anyways. > >> All this does not answer at all definitively the question of how to >> avoid one’s art from appropriation by the dominant order. It is a >> question that perennially bugs me when I come to theorise or distribute >> my own artistic production. Any ideas? >C:the recent histories of the liberal left's technology of words now >incorporated//C:Andrew Ross's "New Age Technoculture"//C:Brian Springer's >"Spin"//C:Chris Wilcha's "The Target Shoots First"//C:outmoded distinctions >between various camps in your fantasies of (c)ontrol//C: we are dissolved// >----------------------------------------------------------------- >"Whatever you do, don't let fear of being consumed in the future >stop you from producing your needs and desires today..." >------------------------------------------------------------------ >*data source:stardotpower > > >____________________________________________________________________ >Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > > >_______________________________________________ >Nettime-bold mailing list >Nettime-bold@nettime.org >http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold > > +++|++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++|++??? data]h![bleede-inge un.till it hertz + wollongong.starway.net.au/~mezandwalt +++|++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++|++??? _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold