porculus on 20 Aug 2000 08:00:08 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> L.A. Times column, 8/14/00 -- Tech Policy |
> The issue that we've been fighting in the U.S. is that we (many > progressive activists who work on science policy) believe that basic > scientific research should be INCREASED, but -- the all-important but -- > supplemented with and guided by "national goals" that are democratically > derived. Republicans don't believe in national goals for science policy. > They don't want any intermediate or "bridge" programs between basic > research and the private sector. This is an old, Vannevar Bush-era model > of science policy that other nations abandoned long ago. it's an old monacal argument now to say fundamental research programs are quite infected by operation ones i.e.the investment for research is now so enormous for hoping resuslts there is long time ago research have socialized goals i.e. guided by militaro industrial decision maker. anyway every monk knows also pentagon is an huge financier of non profitable begining programs for increase the profitability of private one, and please in this context it's a joke to speak about democratically or non democratically defined goal : this partnership have prooved its formidable efficiency and as never down the age : may be the sher raison of suprémacy of US. btw as it is question of 'virtual machine' i would speak about an extraordinary one: the star war by reagan, and this one is not without close relationship with this question. a cocktail of bluff/science/$/fictionnal social analysis. monacaly yours _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold