Lumpenilluminate on 1 Dec 2000 12:33:17 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> NO PROTEST NO PROFIT >>> Consultation |
<< In a message dated 01/12/00 01:55:16 GMT Standard Time, snafu@kyuzz.org writes: << if you disagreed so much with these goals or methods, you could have not send anything and partecipate only to those protests which are pure and uncontaminated. http://www.0100101110101101.org/PROTEST=PROFIT/ best, snafu >> Con - raid.....as you 've included the 'protest = profit' url (CHEAP SPAM OR WHAT ?) and due to general tone, I'll assume partisanship here.....intrueging when one considers the early days of this dispute and the nettime subscribers not even being exposed to our initial source letters of 'PROTEST' to the JUDGES and the fact that two formal complaints have been registered with the enterprise organisers....... that we specifically requested you publish in full.....interesting you prefer to collude and mislead in disengenous sniping rather than publish the appeals.....the 2nd one in particular covers your points raised......but to just paraphrase 'are you going to add censorship and bureaucratic centralism to the list '?? Ludo (Minister of information to the L.I.) NO URL IN SPAMMING >> _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold