Felix Stalder on 5 Dec 2000 04:02:27 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> Fw: Enemies of the Future |
>Hasn't anyone noticed that the NASDAQ is *DOWN* 50% overall and Barlow's >vaunted DOT.Communism has fallen 90%+ since April, 2000? We all have noticed that, how couldn't we. But the question is: does it matter? Personally and immediately, it doesn't matter to do me. I do not own high-tech stock. Zero. But that's besides the point. As far as the bigger picture is concerned, I doubt if it matter that much. Yes, some very vocal egos have been hurt. The layoffs so far have been trivial in numbers and many have affected people who have desired skill sets. It's not like closing of the closing of coal mines in the 1980s. Yes, the NASDAQ is down 50%.; for the shortsighted. Bad luck for the day-traders. But overall, say, over five years, or even two years, the index still has risen. What has changed is that some opinions fell out of vogue that were pretty ludicrous to begin with, such as "the internet economy will swallow everything else". AOL/TimeWarner seems more like the exception than the rule. Or, social security can be stabilized through the stock market. Just invest your retirement money and go golfing. Did you honestly believe that? The high-tech boom looks like the railway boom in the 19th century. Lots of up and down on the stock market, great hopes, great psychological potential (after all, the locomotive was the first major machine that was "in public", rather than inside factories, railroads were the biggest, most expensive and most complex industrial endeavour at the time). Eventually, some got very rich, some lost a lot of money, other earned or lost mediocre sums. In the wake, Europe and America were transformed, a new degree of market integration was realized, mass production became even more important, and a modern form of nationalism was born. As much as it seemed to contemporaries, the financiers at Wall Street, or the Rothschilds in Europe, did not constitute a secret government and the world as they knew it did not end. It changed, and so does it now. But the falling of the NASDAQ indicates nothing but a slower pace if change, it indicates historical continuity. The New Economy is new, but its hardly the first one to be so. Felix --------------------++----- Les faits sont faits. http://www.fis.utoronto.ca/~stalder _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold