Alan Sondheim on 13 Dec 2000 08:59:57 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Dialog of an Executioner |
- Dialog of an Executioner no separa-tion at all, just an indentation. The Florida Supreme Court has:the card—a cha d—is hang-ing, say by two corners. In other cases there is:Cite as: 531 U. S. ____ (2000) 7 Per Curiam them. In some cases a piece of:Supreme Court do not satisfy the minimum requirement for non-arbitrary:Supreme Court do not satisfy the minimum requirement for non-arbitrary Your his recount mechanisms implemented in response to the decisions of the Florida is across my lakes recount mechanisms implemented in response to the decisions of the Florida ideogrammar them. In some cases a piece of the card—a chad—is hang-ing,:r PeCurm:Cite as: 531 U. S. ____ (2000) 7:susceptible to much further refinement. In this instance,:decisions of the Florida Supreme Court do not satisfy the your protruding cases the general command to ascertain intent is not is in my giving recount mechanisms implemented in response to your dead passion seeps into their recount mechanisms implemented in response to the - turn- ing them violent executioner _ _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold