[Nettime-bold] nettime censorship

[Lumpenilluminate {AT} aol.com]

Could you advise all subscribers why you have chosen to censor the 
protest=profit thread, evidenced by all recent contributions -after your 
publishing of our fatwa- being suppressed.
In such cases shouldn't you advise subscribers of your decisions to limit the 
freedom of expression contributors may exorcise ? as a failure to do so 
simply amounts to misrepresentation (using as it does the royal prerogative 
of not responding or engaging in debate but simply misinforming and 
re-contextualising i.e. colluding with the idea that there is no longer any 
debate re - this item ).
Is it simply because its not going your way in that it exposes the abject 
poverty of your pseudo-revolutionary pose,or perhaps youre a little 
embarrassed that you didn't spot the fact that you'd unwittingly allowed a 
fatwa to be published (the text The Workers Are Free Activists i.e 
t.w.a.f.a............f.a.t.w.a.).
This in and of itself is a fascinating act for a site aspiring to examine 
culture and art -direct 

Ludo (minister of information for the lumpen illuminates)..


_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold {AT} nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold