{ brad brace } on 20 Feb 2001 10:09:51 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime>net.art-history |
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Pit Schultz wrote: > [...] > > for the history net.art provided its own interpretation, > the 'classics of net.art'. the historification was a > constant theme, so many of the works are beeing done > in the sense of "it will have been seen as" (futur II) Quite accurate... The vast majority of 'creatives' online then and now, were indeed gleefully side-stepping the oldartworld's incestuous, oppressive institutions and its parasitical 'critical careerists' (I liked "ascii paparazzi!" =)). The "classic net-artists" were merely a few of the first to (regressively) behave online like our regular "make-art-for-museums artists," and sure enough, the whole ol' tired insidious art-institutional entourage was quick to swallow the bait. But how interesting is that? /:b _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold