[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> The Lens of Images[ nlp analysis ]

[josh zeidner <jjzeidner {AT} yahoo.com>]

 There is more where that came from.

 ACtually I think I have developed a technique to
determine the informational relevancy MATHEMATICALLY
of various messages in a newsgroup in relation to all
other messages...

 -josh


> 
> Excellent!
> 
> What an amazing thing to see my words distilled -
> narrative through the filter
> of database.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> DC
> 
> 
> >> THE LENS OF IMAGES
> >>
> >> Desire, Commodities, Media and Hacking
> >>
> >
> >
> > MOST COMMON TRIGRAMS:
> >
> > frequency,  lexeme
> >
> > 3           : the.world.as
> > 3           : the.act.of
> > 3           : a.kind.of
> > 2           : the.spirit.of
> > 2           : world.as.a
> > 2           : is.the.desire
> > 2           : you.find.some
> > 2           : at.the.world
> > 2           : in.the.service
> > 2           : the.empire.of
> > 2           : the.provisionality.of
> > 2           : the.desire.to
> > 2           : only.possible,.but
> > 2           : of.database.and
> > 2           : not.only.possible,
> > 2           : the.centre.of
> > 2           : the.service.of
> > 2           : make.a.new
> >
> > MOST COMMON BIGRAMS( WITH POS FILTERS ):
> >
> > 5           : the.world
> > 4           : bits.of
> > 3           : the.desire
> > 3           : the.media
> > 3           : images.are
> > 3           : world.as
> > 3           : database.and
> > 3           : the.act
> > 3           : the.culture
> > 3           : all.texts
> > 2           : the.provisionality
> > 2           : centre.of
> > 2           : the.mainstream
> > 2           : relation.between
> > 2           : the.centre
> > 2           : the.spirit
> > 2           : spirit.of
> > 2           : of.desire
> > 2           : search.for
> > 2           : museums.of
> > 2           : william.burroughs
> >
> >
> >> David Cox, September 2001
> >>
> >> d.cox {AT} mailbox.gu.edu.au
> >>
> >> Images are themselves a lens on the culture which
> >> makes them. Walter
> >> Benjamin was both right and wrong about art in
> the
> >> age of mechanical
> >> reproduction. He was correct in stating that as
> >> images proliferate, their
> >> overall commercial value in depreciates. He was
> >> wrong in assuming that
> >> manufactured images are worth less than their
> 'real
> >> world' referent.
> >
> > ....
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant
> messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
> >http://im.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> David Cox B.Ed, Grad Dip (Hons)
> Lecturer in Digital Screen Production,
> School of Film, Media and Cultural Studies
> Nathan Campus
> Griffith University
> Brisbane
> Queensland 4111
> Australia
> Telephone: ph:  +61 7 38755165
> Mobile: 0438 050863
> Fax:  +61 7 38757730
> Email: d.cox {AT} mailbox.gu.edu.au
> personal web site:
> http://www.netspace.net.au/~dcox/dcox.html
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com


_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold {AT} nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold