www.nettime.org Nettime mailing list archives
| wade tillett on Fri, 21 Sep 2001 04:39:43 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> ::batteries, buddies & other binaries:: |
i heard a preacher on the radio last night, comparing this to the
interim between the crucifixion and the resurrection. (wasn't christ's
death was supposed to be a destruction of the binary?)
this was an attack on the economy of the binary, the simulated
discourse/oligopoly/utopic space, and at its most basic level - the
equivalence and economy of justice.
the most flustering to the recreation of the binary being that the
enemy, for a brief interval, was without a face. (although a face was
quickly produced.)
the (new/old) binary of us/them, imploded, without a defined other.
how could justice be accomplished without the other?
how could economy be preserved?
the binary was quickly re-created/re-distributed by the media to one
of us/them, good/evil, past/future, attack/vengeance, crime/justice.
whether or not justice *can* be achieved, the *perception* of the
achievement of justice will be reinstated. bombs will be dropped in
order that the perception of justice be restored, that the economy of
the binary be restored, that an internal (utopic) space be re-created
and opposed to an exterior space.
"What we seem to have, then, is an apparent subject, an impersonal
pseudo-subject, the abstract 'one' of modern social space, and -
hidden within it, concealed by its illusory transparency - the real
'subject', namely state (political) power."
(lefebvre, production of space 51)
there are thus two economies at work, the economy which creates the
utopic space (of commerce/freetrade/america) and the economy _within_
the utopic space. these are intimately connected, but through a sort
of filter in which the effects, the distribution, to the exterior of
the space are hidden from the 'choices' and participants within the
utopic space.
the construction of space can be said to now be accomplished by a
'pluralistic' method - i.e. distribution is now delivered to specific
points, rather than area to a degree. but the space of economy
remains, is recreated, expanded. in fact, scarcity and an economy of
have and have-nots, 0/1, binary is intentionally created and expanded
(IP being a current example).
while a 'pluralistic' multi-pronged method may now be employed
instead, it is still employed to contain the binary 'other' - a
singular, defined other who does not participate within the rules of
the space, who has not been assimilated, innoculated, and contained
within the 'pluralistic' space of utopia. pluralism exists only within
the utopic space. its borders are always binary, as the basic economy
by which it is created is binary, that of justice.
it was the space created between the towers which was the real force
of their binary structure. a space within space. a utopic space.
and this utopic space was breached.
hence virilio's endocolonization. the 're-creation' (expansion) of the
utopic space. and at the definition of that space, power.
"... this action, although it is not desirable, is necessary because
the final objective of the insurrection is a free and democratic
society,
WHEREBY ACTS OF FORCE ARE NOT NECESSARY."
(central intelligence agency, psychological operations in guerrilla
warfare, at textz.com)(a guide-book on how to create a space of
simulated democracy)
//
also related, post "091401"
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0109/msg00130.html
_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold {AT} nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold