Frederic Madre on Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:41:01 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: RHIZOME_RAW: /// 0100101110101101.ORG /// Opportunitymakes the thief |
you guys suck trad art milk big time http://pleine-peau.com/home/top10.html f. At 16:56 28/01/2002 +0100, PROPAGANDA@0100101110101101.ORG wrote: >/// PROPAGANDA /// HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG /// > > > > ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS ># HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG/home/PROPAGANDA/PRESS > > > > >/// from "Telepolis", 14 Dec 2001 >/// http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/sa/11341/1.html > > > > >Opportunity makes the thief >Sensation around a net.art exhibition in Korea > > >by Tilman Baumgaertel > >Probably one shouldn't give the passwords of a server to net.artists, >which are known for the theft of websites and the spreading of "art >viruses". The organizators of the net.art group exhibition Korea web >art, that showed among others the Critical Art Ensemble, Mark America, >Superbad and Entropy8Zuper!, made this error. > >In order to be able to load their contribution on the website of the >show, which takes place only in the Internet, they gave the access to >the computer to the Italian artist duo 0100101110101101.ORG. > >They of course loaded some web pages on the computer. But in the night, >in which the exhibition was officially opened in the Net, >0100101110101101.ORG replaced Web-Art with Net.art and exchanged all the >directories on the server. The effect: the links of the opening site >brought to the wrong work of the wrong artists. > >The ones who visited at that time the freshly "opened" website and for >example clicked the link to the work of Lisa Jevbratt, came to the one >of Motomichi Nakamura, who wanted to see the work of Critical Art >Ensemble, ended up on Superbad. Although the reworked website was online >only few hours, now unpleasant consequences threaten the ones involved. >Some artist complained to the curator Marc Voge, and also the Korean >Ministry for culture and tourism, which financed the exhibition, took >the incident badly. Now the action could cost even the job or at least a >financial punishment to Voge. > >Marc Voge answered Telepolis only with the short comment "I love >everything 0100101110101101.ORG does on the Net". The punishing threats >meet a curator, who in the past stood out for his engagement in art in >the Internet. Marc Voge organized in the year 2000 the Web exhibition >Total Museum as completion of a contemporary art show, for which among >other things produced works by Jodi and Alexei Shulgin. "Korea web art" >should obviously continue this beginning. The solid exhibition with >renowned artists, which stands under the title "Alone Together", could >now be the last one of such presentations. > >In the past, similar actions assured that art institutions gave >completely up with net.art. The net.art competition Extension of the >Hamburg Museum for Contemporary Art, for example, "was hacked" 1997 by >the Hamburg artist Cornelia Sollfrank, which sent several hundred works >by supposed net artists under fake names. The jury fell on the Fake, and >stood afterwards embarrassed. > >Since that time that Hamburg Museum for Contemporary Art made no >exhibition and no competition of net.art anymore. The artists involved >were, as may be understood, not enthusiastic about the action: while >Sawad Brooks compared the action with the erased work of De Kooning by >Robert Rauschenberg, Steve Kurtz of the Critical Art Ensemble (CAE) >writes in an email the fact that "the work of CAE is without copyright >and therefore can be reworked into other works by everyone. That is at >any time possible - even with an "opening". However he criticizes that >Marc Voge finds himself in difficulties after this action and assumed >that therefore what concerned above all to the initiators was to promote >themselves: "There is nothing funny for an hacker to hack an artshow in >the Web. It seems that 0100101110101101.ORG wanted to place themselves >above all in the center of the whole exhibition, producing a storm in an >electronic water glass. Good publicity - no consequences." > >Lisa Jevbratt however finds: "This is very typical net.art. Not more and >not less. So it was to be expected. In net.art it happens often to be >invited around inviting, and infiltrating." > > > >Links > >http://www.koreawebart.org >http://www.0100101110101101.ORG >http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/sa/7808/1.html >http://www.totalmuseum.org/webproject8.html >http://www.hamburger-kunsthalle.de/aext/wettb.htm >http://www.obn.org/femext >http://www.critical-art.net > > > > >/// "El Pais", 20 Dec 2001 >/// "El colectivo 01.ORG 'piratea' el sitio del Web Art Festival de >Corea" [ spanish ] >http://elpais.es/suple/ciberpais/articulo.html?d_date=20011220&xref=20011220elpciboci_3&type=Tes&anchor=elpciboci > >/// "ExiWebArt", 6 Dec 2001 >/// "Korea Web Art Festival: net art e hacking a Seoul" [ italian ] >http://www.exibart.com/IDNotizia3570.htm > > > > >/// PROPAGANDA /// HTTP://WWW.0100101110101101.ORG /// > > >+ hey teacher, leave them kidz alone >-> Rhizome.org >-> post: list@rhizome.org >-> questions: info@rhizome.org >-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/subscribe.rhiz >-> give: http://rhizome.org/support >+ >Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the >Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php3 _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold