Re: [Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime>net.art-history

[{ brad brace } <bbrace {AT} eskimo.com>]

On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Pit Schultz wrote:

> [...]
>
> for the history net.art provided its own interpretation,
> the 'classics of net.art'. the historification was a
> constant theme, so many of the works are beeing done
> in the sense of "it will have been seen as" (futur II)

Quite accurate... The vast majority of 'creatives' online then and now,
were indeed gleefully side-stepping the oldartworld's incestuous,
oppressive institutions and its parasitical 'critical careerists' (I liked
"ascii paparazzi!" =)). The "classic net-artists" were merely a few of the
first to (regressively) behave online like our regular
"make-art-for-museums artists," and sure enough, the whole ol' tired
insidious art-institutional entourage was quick to swallow the bait. But
how interesting is that? 

/:b







#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo {AT} bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime {AT} bbs.thing.net