Jim Carrico on Sun, 21 Oct 2001 01:48:09 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> WOS 2: die neue aufrichtigkeit |
http://www.potlatch.net/2001/10/18.html Greetings from the world's coldest rainforest, the world's largest squatter's camp, a million square kilometers of unceded aboriginal land that is neither british nor columbian. The icy downpour (a little early this year!) is in stark contrast to sunny, balmy berlin, city of construction sites, after-after-hours clubs, and international capitol of cool, where we've been hangin with hipster intellectuals till dawn and beyond. (yo homes! respect to neven, mike, pit, erik, and sabine.) The occasion: the Wizards-of-OS 2 [1] conference, an attempt to focus an amorphous worldwide movement which aims to apply the strategies of free software to culture. Did it succeed? I would have to say no - but the lack of answers is more than mitigated by the fact that finally we're asking the right questions. It starts with noticing that the most outrageous experiment in practical anarchy ever attempted just happens to comprise the leading edge of the most massively and suddenly successful communications medium in history, but that this has so far had little influence on our 'social self-image' as a species, outside a few tech enclaves. Free software "works": can other forms of creative expression evolve which draw from a similar reservoir of seemingly untapped and unlimited resources? If open-ness, the lack of central control, is good for software, is it also good for writing, music, visual or virtual art of any kind? If not, why not? No solid answers yet; no problem. As usual with these affairs, the important stuff happens in the hallways and interzones, in the randomizing churn of emergent behavour. Some highlights: The Sarai [2] project from New Delhi, inspired by the "public domain" waystations on the ancient caravan routes, aiming to create a 'digital sarai' for collaborative, open, and exploratory art and communication. " The free exchange of code, information and cultural products is central to our conception of the digital public domain. That is why we will encourage everyone, scholars, practitioners and citizens at large, to engage and enlarge this domain. For a society like India, where hierarchy, inequality and control influence the production of ideas, a free software culture is worth fighting for." The life sharing [3] project from Bologna - an anagram of 'file sharing' which extends this idea to it's ultimate limits: making literally everything on their server publicly accessible, a virtual root account for every visitor to their site - including access to all personal email etc - read-only, but wide open all the same. What nerve! A brief report on the now-defunct Luther Blissett [4] project, a "multiple name" collaborative identity used by a nameless number of individuals for purposes of radical intervention, which overtly connects the 'free software' concept with situationist [5] notions of anti-copyright and cultural insurrection. And of course Michael Linton's LETS [6] system, an "open money" [7] project that puts the "eco" back into "economics" by reinventing money as community currency, a simple measurement of value ("imagine running out of inches") backed by the reputation of the issuer. They've been working for about 20 years in a very practical way developing an economic model that has been taken up by communities all over the world - there are thousands of LETS networks, with hundreds of thousands of members. The next step is to connect them all together. A money system based on reciprocity and reputation may sound familiar to anyone who has been following the debate on artist-friendly micropayment systems on this and other sites over the last year or so - and indeed this idea of a community currency is a very close fit with what we see as an essential democratizing of the world's financial infrastructure. It also begins to approach Todd Boyle's ideas [8] about using shared accounting systems (aka webledgers) to route around banks in our financial dealings with one another. Clearly, we need to start putting these ideas into practice. And dare we mention the panel on Collaborative Journalism hosted by Erik Moeller of Infoanarchy [9], featuring Meg Hourihan, late of Blogger.com, and Timothy Lord of Slashdot. On short notice, due to late cancellation, I was offered the opportunity to present a talk on 'reciprocity and gift culture', as a solution to the problem of finding and rewarding high quality and high resonance writing, music or any other cultural product, particularly in the context of p2p networks and ubiquitous access to distribution. Notes to the talk are available at http://potlatch.net/WOS/p2pj-1.html . Despite occasional lapses into seemingly directionless discourse, WOS 2 was refreshingly free from irony, sarcasm, or smug self-satisfaction. Sept.11 and its aftermath have opened a portal into the hell dimension, a whirling vortex of perpetual warfare that threatens to engulf history and humanity. This adds a certain seriousness to everything we do, and social experiments which tend to oppose this bleak scenario are now being approached with a sense that the time for bullshitting is over - the "new sincerity" is here. ____________________________________________ 1. http://wizards-of-os.org/ 2. http://www.sarai.net 3. http://www.0100101110101101.org 4. http://lutherblissett.net/primer/ramp.html 5. http://nothingness.org/SI/index.html 6. http://www.gmlets.u-net.com/faq.html 7. http://www.openmoney.org 8. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/decentralization/message/4107 9. http://www.infoanarchy.org # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net