www.nettime.org
Nettime mailing list archives

<nettime> Request to Nettime to be part of [digest, re phillips, spornit
Beth Rosenberg on Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:36:12 +0200 (CEST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

<nettime> Request to Nettime to be part of [digest, re phillips, spornitz]


     [digested  {AT}  nettime]

"Beth Rosenberg" <beth {AT} eyebeam.org>
     Re: Request to Nettime to be part of DISTRIBUTED <...> [phillips]
     Re: Request to Nettime to be part of DISTRIBUTED <...> [spornitz]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From: "Beth Rosenberg" <beth {AT} eyebeam.org>
Subject: Re: <nettime> Request to Nettime to be part of DISTRIBUTED <...>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:30:48 -0400

According to various articles that have surfaced on the "mob"..I would say 
that smart mobs are a kind of artistic community and one that we'd like to 
address on the upcoming online forum.  Mobs, hives, communities, lists, 
blogs--this is the stuff of artistic collaboration and all of this will be in 
discussion in the DISTRIBUTED CREATIVITY online forum in November.  Won't 
nettime join us?

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:54:16 -0700

  ed_phillips <ed {AT} cronos.net> wrote:
>I wasn't under the impression that Nettime was a community in even the
>most self-conscious uses of the word. It does strike me as somewhat
>humorous to see a word that is only vexed amongst the shipwrecked,
>weary survivors of net ascii discourse used to address a purported
>"group" that carries the name, nettime.
 <...>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From: "Beth Rosenberg" <beth {AT} eyebeam.org>
Subject: Re: <nettime> Request to Nettime to be part of DISTRIBUTED <...>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:35:10 -0400

Hi Bill.  So, are you saying you'd like to see nettime participate in this 
discussion, because that was basically what I was asking.  Or, is your 
response an artistic statement of some sort?  Please advise. Thanks!

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:58:21 -0500

  Bill Spornitz <spornitz {AT} mts.net> wrote:
>Beth R.;
>
>Although I cannot speak for the nettime community of which *you* speak I can 
>say this:
 <...>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo {AT} bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime {AT} bbs.thing.net