Benjamin Geer on Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:38:47 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> bowling alone |
A posting from rattus norvegicus <wbario@tin.it> on the rekombinant mailing list, suggesting that the Internet has contributed to making Americans less sociable and less politically active, and Italians more so: http://liste.rekombinant.org/wws/arc/rekombinant/2004-08/msg00015.html I've translated some of rattus's posting from Italian: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sociologist Robert Putnam's book _Bowling Alone_ (2000) seems to have gone unnoticed by many observers of American politics.... It is an important text for its portrait of the decline in Americans' social involvement. Putnam studied endless statistics on the social behaviour of US citizens during the past 40 years, and drew some rather impressive conclusions. The amount of time Americans spend with friends has decreased by 35% in the past 15 years. They sign 30% fewer petitions than they did at the end of the 80s. Extrapolitical social activities have fared no better: in the middle of the 70s, the average American attended a club, cultural association or church once a month; this frequency has since dropped by 60%. In 1975 Americans got together with friends at home 15 times a year on average; now they do so only half as often. Putnam perceptively lists the consequences of this social disaster, particularly its negative effects on health, culture, education, etc. There is an intriguing element in Putnam's explanations of this phenomenon of progressive isolation: although he singles out electronic entertainment as one of the main causes (among many others) of the privatisation of free time, he suspends judgement on the Internet. It's no coincidence that Scott Heiferman, the CEO of MeetUp.com, a site that boasts more than a million members, maintains that his global meeting system was inspired by Putnam's book. It's worth reflecting on this in relation to the impact of the Internet on different cultures, considering the differences between the US and Europe.... Recent statistics from Censis seem to show a correlation [in Italy] between Internet usage and political participation: "The type of person who takes to the streets is, in particular: male (14.4%, compared to 9.4% among women), young (15.3% among people aged 18-34, compared to 12.8% among those aged 35-64 and 4.4% among those 65 and over), a university graduate (16%, compared to 5% who have only finished primary school), employed (13.7%) or a student (30.7%), and lives in a medium-sized city in the Centre-South of Italy. But above all he is an Internet user. In the past year, those who use the Internet demonstrated much more than those who don't (17% compared to 8.1%); a good familiarity with the Internet therefore represents a valuable resource that translates into a culture of socio-political participation." Still, one is left with the feeling that as far as the social and political effects of the Internet are concerned, we're still in an embryonic phase, in which many paths are still to be explored. Wittgenstein, in one of his metaphors, suggested that we make a distinction between the movement of water along a riverbed, and the displacement of the riverbed itself, even though, between the two, there isn't a clear distinction. Rattus # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net