E. Miller on Mon, 7 Mar 2005 23:54:26 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> funding education? |
It seems to me that you interpreted it exactly right. I teach as adjunct at a state university here in Oregon. There's just no money for hiring tenured faculty when budgets are shrinking, costs are rising, and there's a glut of suckers like me who will teach as adjunct for a fraction of tenure-track full-time pay. And if the gig you're referring to is the University of Arkansas one that came up after Googling the job description, then I'm really not surprised. UA is hurting for state funding like most US public universities: http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/03/03/News/318162.html Financially it's quite rational and makes sense. Use the dirt-cheap adjuncts to teach undergrads, use the tenured 'name' faculty to chase grant money for research and prestige and USN&WR college ranking statistics. Teaching ability has nothing to do with it. And if they can't pull in the grant money they probably won't be granted tenure after the probationary period. Yay, it's a Brave New World of free-market fundamentalism as applied to education! Eric On 3/6/05 9:35 AM, "Aileen Derieg" <emonk@george.eliot.priv.at> wrote: > A job offer forwarded to a German-speaking mailing list the other day > caught my attention, not because I am looking for a job, but because I > find the implications of one of the requirements disturbing, if I > understand this correctly. <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net