Re: <nettime> Markets, Hierarchies, Networks: 2 questions

[John Hopkins <jhopkins {AT} commspeed.net>]

Just a quick comment on the differing theories on networks -- it is 
precisely this situation where network theory is advancing in 
bio-genetics, biology, quantum computing, cognitive science,  
sociology, psychology, computer science, and so  on that points to 
the fact that the theory is inadequate when using a single 
discipline's research base.  To summarily discard, say, hardware 
analysis such as (for quick example!):

Papadimitriou, I. and Georgiadis, L., Energy-Aware Broadcast Trees in 
Wireless Networks, Mobile Networks and Applications, 9, pps. 567-581, 
2004.

in a discussion on

ANT, SCOT,  or SNA

Law, J., Networks, Relations, Cyborgs: on the Social Study of 
Technology, Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, UK, 
http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Networks-Relations-Cyborgs.pdf, 
2003.

will not come to an overarching and sensible conclusion.

There is yet to develop a coherent fundamental basis for 
understanding the dynamics of these beasts that we are all dancing 
around and on occasion calling networks.  The discussion will always 
tend to diverge without such a basis.  But it's great to hear the 
different views, though this has been hashed out before on nettime 
over the course of the last decade.

A rhetorical third question:  what ideas comprise the actual advances 
in understanding of the dynamics of networks in the last decade?

Cheers
John



#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo {AT} bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime {AT} bbs.thing.net