brian carroll on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:14:56 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> spectacles of terror (4.20.06) |
[fugue for armageddon in D by Secretary Rumsfeld] --- if it is true that corporate democracy may have overtaken human democracy in the governance of the United States, and that this has in turn become a corporate dictatorship driven by machine-values (dehumanized) in which morality has no place, then it is possible that in representing this situation in the mass media, something equivalent to a mirage may be seen, and believed, by the masses even while what is being portrayed brings the distinct possibility that 'things are not as they seem.' thankfully, all the media theory of the last 30+ years will help decipher another interpretation of the current events as privately presented in this 'reality, inc' aligned with the Neoconserative ideology, and consider what is going on from another perspective, that of our shared public humanity. if one takes into consideration the spectacular terror of 9/11, the United 93 airplane that crashes and become a movie ('coming soon to you'), and the anthrax attacks against media outlets, it brings into relation this dimension of mass media and how it influences mass perceptions about what is going on. and, because the mass media 'represent' what is going on, legitimizing what is considered 'real' for the masses, it becomes a choke-point in terms of the power of representation in the structure of the corporate democracy. this is an attempt to say that there is a possibility that the mass media would be able to take various views of events, such as 9/11 or the anthrax letters, or United 93, in a public democracy of human citizens who question these views in ways that may be beyond the self- limitations of the corporate citizens who now decide what is and is not going to be represented, and how. in other words, mass media creates and establishes its own empirical viewpoint, shared among the private mass media, as to what is going on, through some kind of consensus in which 'the party line' of the events related to 9/11 and 'terror' are now defaulted to a corporate viewpoint of these events, and in particular, oftentimes one that is beneficial to 'Neoconservative Reality Inc.' thus, there is an issue involved of who the mass media is serving, should what is being represented not match up with the reality of events as they actually exist, and greater truths. i.e. the freedom to represent what is going on, from a human perspective, with the human rights to speak truth from within this governing structure of private power, media, and corporations. this is to say that the possibility exists that 'truth' could be separated from 'reality' at this choke-point of mass media, by which what is represented becomes a misrepresentation of current events, which by default serve the private corporate dictatorship that has been established. for example, while the 'official' storyline for 9/11 may have been an impossible scenario of Al Qaeda terrorists defeating every redundant security setup within the continental United States, and achieving pin-point accuracy beyond human thresholds and limitations to achieve 'their' objectives, that even though there are much better explanations based on common sense, peer review of facts, correspondences and prime motives given history since the Nixon Whitehouse and its players now having reinvested the works, en total, -- that the other versions are locked out of democratic governance and its critical functioning as public checks and balances by this same privatized media, whose corporate allegiances may sway towards Neoconservative ideology. thus, it is possible that what is being represented in the mass media regarding 9/11 is a complete and total lie, a fiction, which is propagated through privately owned distribution of views which are supposedly a 'public representation' of what is going on, which could instead be a total fabrication. a shadow play. and yet, having the mass media under the control of private corporations in a corporate dictatorship would enable any human dissent or better explanations to be short-circuited and kept outside of the governing structure-- and thus it sets up the distinct probability that if this official storyline was actually fictitious, that so too, 'the terrorists' would likely be suspect as to who is actually the terrorists, both as to who conducted these operations on 9/11 and those that this .US administration seeks to root out in the .US homeland. for, as stated previously, there is every indication that 'the terrorists' are human citizens who stand against this Neocon takeover of the government, and thus all the terrorist surveillance and break-ins and black-bag jobs are going to happen to citizens, including eventually one-way tickets to Guantanamo prison, where there is torture, etc. it is only a matter of TIME, if such a thing were to evolve in a certain way. this would be an indication of the level of fascism involved, the threat and the reality that is now unspoken. the place where this becomes dated is in the overriding ideology and assumptions upon which this worldview is based. for this electromagnetic shadow-play has been expert in its manipulation of the infrastructures to get them to do its bidding, and the pavlovian behavior engineering based on fear and desire effectively allows the electorate to be shaped into malleable formations, via this illusion. yet, pictures lie. so too, the larger 'world picture' of the Neoconservatism and its philosophy, now ideology where the truth of events is separated out from the reality of events, such as with Iraq and Mr. Bush calling this a victory of any kind, in contravention to sanity itself. the lies start to reveal themselves and become transparent, as soon as a more accurate scaffolding can be constructed around the facade and deconstruct it part by part, to locate the underlying structural systems involved. in this case, what is good for the .US is being represented by this .US president Bush as equating with that that is good for Neoconservatives, when nothing could be further from this - if taken in terms of constitutional democracy, the rule of law, human rights, freedom, etc. (*this is to say that the lies become transparent, at a certain point, and signals begin to be sent 'in the clear' because the human panopticon knows and sees beyond the lies said to represent the events. that is, if the human modeling is more accurate than the false representation. then, it becomes a matter of common sense, and linking up various details into a larger whole, regardless of the private take over of mass media, to which this mass media can then also add to details to confirm/deny certain dynamics, in a telegraphic keying of correspondences to lay down a shared yet distributed reality, outside of the existing hierarchical control, if within states of emergency.) in this sense, instead of the 'world picture' and _making_things_appear a certain way, like magic tricks of illusionists, where terror events are 'made for television' and influence this cybernetic feedback mechanism so to shape public opinion and thus policy mandates, by social-behavioral engineering of the somatized electorate,-- it is that this 'world picture' could be a total lie which is misrepresenting the basic reality and truth of events, and this is where things exist today, now. and people, citizens, souls, minds, lives, are captured en masse within this machinic-beast of a situation, a labyrinth of sorts, and thus it becomes a question of: what does one do now? the first thing to remember is that everything that is 'officially' said to _represent what is going on, is directly related to the establishing this as the situation as it exists. thus, to speak 'against terror' is actually to speak for the terror of the existing state of affairs, within its own reference system. that is, if it is a false-construct, and that the Neoconservatives are actually the source of terror, they 'own' terror, so to speak, and can manipulate it in any-which-way to navigate the situation. thus, if getting 'buy-in' by Democrats on the terror-war, the battle is already lost over the basic dynamic which drives all policy in this state of terrorism. this terrorist state, and its governance, then, is given a free-hand with this terrorism, to unilaterally pursue policies against those who it deems 'terrorists' -- who just so happen to be the enemies of Neoconservatives, GOP, Likud, etc. to the point where law-abiding .US citizens have become enemies of this fascist state of affairs. and here is the first differentiation in representations-- that this difference between the private Neoconservative representations of events and those of public citizens in a constitutional democracy are between those of a dehumanized machinic-value system which is fascist, and now governs the .US and other allied states, while this is contrasted with a human value system and human rights which this is the mortal enemy of, in what truly amounts to a holy war between the forces of good against evil, in which evil is now represented as if it is an enlightened democracy, while instead this is instead a deep dark and long nighttime we are making our way through, until we are able to defeat this false-reality with the light we share as human beings, to liberate us from our most base, least moral, and this deadening condition, to take on this enemy within ourselves. that is, some in the human community have chosen to betray their humanity, and govern us as if we are apes or machines, to which they are gods. gods without morals, art, love, life, or beauty. 'gods' without intelligence beyond their own limitations. their own glorification, worship, deification. this 'god' is an automated machine, ultimately, that is against humanity itself. human governance, freedom, human rights, constitutional governance, human sentience, spiritual nature, everything except itself and its own relativistic and limited modeling of events. it is to downgrade 'humanity' and place it eternally into the box of 'mankind' and those who control this terrifying worldview. luckily, this 'world picture' is full of distortions, which can be perceived in the human panopticon. and the 'visual art' of terrorism can inform what is going on, from other perspectives, vantages, views, to gain increased awareness, intelligence, as to how to proceed. and what makes this a point of hope is that it is much more likely that a 'world circuit' exists, as a worldview, by which to weave together these various threads and wires and connections in which to realize a more accurate and realistic and truth-filled version of current events, than any 'world picture' could, if this were the immediate basis for redefining all events in one fell-swoop. instead, a new reality may evolve, as per events, which may bit by bit recontextualize the past, present, and future within another structural framework, a new building of this state of affairs, in local and global scales. so, the network becomes a critical infrastructure, whether wired or wireless, or whether it is natural or artificial or virtual, that the harmonies may build upon one another as a shared music is found. that, versus the dissonant noise, the vast tragedy of sense, the utter ugliness of the false, the evil portrayed as if good in some twisted logic in which the human heart has been made mechanical, in the misguided attempt only ancient myth could explain, at this point, the scale being so absolute. there are many people who are educated in breaking these codes, these illusions of the imaginary which is based on imagery and the mastery of their manipulation. and what can be said of current events can best be understood -within the context of the world picture and its imagery as used by the Neoconservatives- by those familiar with semiotics, symbolism, and Situationist detournement. for in these dimensions the difference between truth and falsity can be better realized, and views that break-through the false-reality can be expertly presented. what follows are several examples of how this Neoconservative 'reality inc' could be seen if it were actually a subversion of the real, and where truth has been replaced by false representations, and to what effect this now exists: * United 93 movie... imagine, for instance, that 9/11 was actually perpetrated by the Neoconservatives, with help from the 40+ year old bureaucracy centered around G.H.W. Bush Sr. (codename: Lucifer) from the Nixon era, as many attest. and that every murder and assassination during these years led to the rise of this shadow play as it is now made manifest. that is, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, the Kennedy brothers, even Reagan's assassination assisting in the rise of such an agenda as was hatched in those years (Neoconservative takover of mideast and imperial presidency) and realized in our own. and that, with enough time, money, and energy, that an event like 9/11 could have been scripted in a larger shadow play, on par with the world designs by Nazi's in World War II. and so any given event is yet just a detail of this larger plan, yet one that is based on misrepresentation and on secrecy of private groups versus that of transparent government in constitutional democracy. and that most of this power comes from this secrecy, this hiding of information, this falsification and building of things based upon a foundation of lies, deceit, trickery, and illusion. and thus, the misrepresentation of events in the mass media would be central to any such 'keeping of the secrets' via privatization of information and perspectives and points of view, because it would threaten all the lies which are invested in such a false construction of this fascist 'reality, inc.' therefore, a competing version of events on 9/11 which is based on facts, truth, and reasoning has it that people from United flight 93 on that fate-filled morning were transfered into an airline hanger at an airport, and never seen from again. and that while this plane is said to have crashed in a field littered with smoking debris, and supposed 'phonecalls' from the passengers are to have testified to their demise as the 'official' storyline goes-- that this portrayal of events is brought into question if the plane (93) has actually been seen flying after 9/11 and was not in-fact downed or destroyed. so too, while passengers may have made phonecalls, they could have done so in a 'mock exercise' as if some corporate training program on behalf of air safety, to provide seemingly authentic and scripted soundscape ('foley' terror flight), and somehow met their demise in an as of yet unknown way, or maybe even did have their throats slit open, only in a hanger in the back of an airport by the fascists, neoconservatives and their allies in government and industry, by the pre-planned willing and knowing hand of the .US government as it is now illegally operating. thus, to have Universal pictures making a movie out of this event would not be to make a portrayal of a real event, as if it were non- fiction and some true accounting of what went on-- and instead, it would allow such a terrorist action by those who have subverted government to misrepresent this and use this terror for their own benefit, to extend its and their influence over the state and its citizens. this is to say, the Hollywood movie would be to take something fictional and attempt to equate it as if factual (the plane went down in a field and not in the back of an airline hanger, where throats were slit by the fascists). and, when the film's trailer threateningly says: "coming soon to you" -- it is this terror within the primal heart, with which this is aimed- against the truth of the situation, and using this to oppress, threaten, and given indication of what _is coming next... in any case, so, there are terrorists filmmakers, and 'either you are with the terrorists or you are against them'-- and humans are against them. and these terrorists are fascists, and they are neoconservatives and others whose allegiance is not to humanity, - and instead to this madness, this inhuman machination of the state as a cybernetic organism out to dominate the planet itself. and so, it is instructive to consider this Flight 93 in relation to the Neoconservative network, as it offers up clues as to how it functions. one such clue is that upon writing the Network Experiment #1 about Donald Rumsfeld and distributing this online, the first thing he did was go to that field where the plane supposedly crashed, and told of the honor of those people who he says he is serving, and then started handing out his _personal medals to people to mark 9/11 heroism/bravery. so, one could say this event has even been branded, to some extent, and becomes a place to regenerate a certain world picture and acts as a reference/marker. the thing about 9/11 and thus United 93, is that it was a precursor for launching the war in Iraq. it became the justification, ultimately, by which to proceed on a primal, emotional level, against the more reasonable processes of governance, which were bypassed by the mass media short-circuit to go to war based on secret information in an emergency, as an act of ideological retaliation. therefore, when President Bush just yesterday once again says he is not taking nuclear weapons 'off the table' with the ongoing conflict with Iran, which plucks the stings of the Neoconservatives like no other issue, he may be sending a larger message when he calls for a "UNITED EFFORT" against Iran and its nuclear development. United 93 perhaps? who might he be signaling - could it be that there are those in a shadow network that are outside of the .US government which could have perpetrated the United 93 butchery which brought about retaliation against Iraq, to do so again, with another false-event such as a strike at a nuclear powerplant or nuclear detonation of a suitcase bomb which would be pinned on Iran, and then justify immediate emergency retaliation? it certainly gets one thinking- especially if there are indeed fascist machinations at work- as this is the dehumanized value system and its cold black-and-white logic of Neoconservative ideology which would justify such an action, as if a cold-blooded machine acting against humanity itself. further yet, Mr. Rumsfeld's queuing of priorities in being forced to engage general dissent and a challenge to this fictitious worldview built by traitors of which he is primary, akin to Nazi Himmler or others, is that he says TIME is on his side. give it some TIME, he says. why? because, something may happen to turn the tide by a new wave of terrorism, that's why. and it works to his advantage as then he is solution, as is the existing ideology. this is to say that there is a folding of the reality of events, such that they have been inverted and the official storyline, while a lie, works to the advantage of what is the mass media representations that have been empirically built-up, which is a consensus view that is a giant lie, the world-picture is false and thus it becomes a 'shadow play' with terrorism as a plot device, and various actors which can fulfill the grand story as concocted. so, if the story _must absolutely go to Iran to destroy their nuclear capacity, that this then becomes an absolute probability of the direction these events will soon be taking; in TIME. the plot just needs to be developed so it can be credible enough to make the necessary decisions by which to act in such a way, that is effective enough to allow judgement to be suspended and to go along with this terrifying script, to accomplish the ideological mandate which is now set on autopilot. "detournement" is akin to taking something that is supposed to work in one way and making it do something other than intended... "somebody has to make a decision. And when a decision is made by the secretary of defense, unless it's illegal or immoral, we go on about doing what we've been told." (PACE). in this case, one could detourne the .US government and have all the .US military on board, serving the .US government while acting against the .US constitution, and by their sheer faith in the goodness of the system, be exploited for things beyond their own perceptions of events: that is, if they are betrayed and are being lied to, or have bought-into lies as if they are greater truth. note to the Joint Chief: no, we don't trust you. and you should not trust yourself any longer either. and here's more: "It unfortunately appears that two of the retired generals (Messrs. Zinni and Newbold) do not understand the true nature of this radical ideology, Islamic extremism, and why we fight in Iraq. We suggest they listen to the tapes of United 93," the piece continued, referring to the hijacked plane that went down in Pennysylvania on 9/11. now, imagine in this scenario if United flight 93 and the butchering of .US citizens was done at the hands of a rogue .US government and facist Neoconservatives. and that those 'arabic' voices could have been anyone, on those tapes, in an airplane hanger. etc. and that this becomes the justification for a war against Islam, and even further 'extremist and radical ideology' -- while this may have been constructed in such a way to justify the .US government acting in this way itself. that is, via a radical Neoconservative ideology and extremist agenda which is itself TERRORISM. in such a situation as this, those in the .US government would be the terrorists who are terrorizing citizens in the .US and abroad, for an imperial agenda on behalf of the fascist Neoconservatives. that is, when Mr. Bush says he is going to hunt down the terrorists and bring them to justice, in the way this would play out -- it would be political enemies who are opposed to this insanely wicked and "evil agenda". that is, ultimately, .US citizens who are against a corporate dictatorship run by a global Neoconservative alliance in the military-industrial complex. though, the detournement works both ways: if it is true that Mr. Bush has banked his career on this 'war of terror' -- so too can .US citizens go after these same terrorists, and start to defeat them, at home and abroad. it is our legal right, even, to defend ourselves, even if pre-emptively, so to stop further such terrorism (by the hands of a rogue government). and, these terrorists are known to have nuclear weapons and WMD, bird flu, among other such devices, to attack the .US citizenry. so the stakes could not be higher, one could say, and the high-noon is happening everywhere at once, locally and globally, and the outcome depends on the decision-making that will next evolve. it comes down to a very black and white decision each person will make: either you are with HUMANITY or you are with the TERRORISTS. Mr. Bush is with the Neoconservative terrorists, and he has been all along. the .US military has been subverted to pursue a neocon agenda, while US soldiers have been "sacrificed" for this automated machinery that operates outside of constitutional democracy and rule of law, and has no relation to human interests or interests of .US citizens: it only charts a course into armageddon. see: Bush: 'I'm the decider' on Rumsfeld http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/18/rumsfeld/ add to such a specter of 'terrorism' that this becomes a business model by which 'terror' enables an economy of sorts, which relies on this terror for its profits. for instance, the entire Homeland security industry and construction of a surveillance state has been beneficial to the very peoples pursuing this agenda, through record business and record profits while public governance on behalf of citizens has ground to a halt, as it contradicts the worldview and its 'reality, inc' and modeling of this situation as if all issues are 'accounted for' in corporate spreadsheets. that is, terrorism is a business model for conquest of the machinery of state, over its own human population via enslavement to corporate government, and against other states in a 'survival of the fittest' global competition for world dominance, based upon this finite western Neocon worldview. in such a case, it is again instructive to look at the stakes Donald Rumsfeld has in such terrorism, as there may be a conflict-of- interests between the self-styled heroic defense secretary who is beyond it all, and the crafty and calculating technocrat whose very soul is that of this machine... take, for instance, the 'threat' of BIRD FLU, which threatens to wipe out millions of people, and that, for instance, after G H.W. Bush traveled to China, within 1-2 days this flu broke out in the country, as in other states where this biological warfare begins having geostrategic dimensions. like the simulcrum of 9/11, it is this terrifying prospect of bird flu which threatens even more and more civil liberties of citizens and could render the population helpless to what is to come next. and in this false representation of the Neoconservative worldview, the .US government would be protecting people from the bird flu, and people would have to trust that they are doing so: when in fact this is social engineering on a whole new level of WMD, and it is in this way that this ideology is fascist at its very core: the .US government (formal and informal) are the beneficiaries of such a bird flue, in political terms, so too with mumps which have been dropped into the midwest here. who knows what is really in the vaccinations, only that the mumps virus makes people sterile. the point of this is to say that this is a business plan: production and consumption. supply and demand. if Bird Flu hits in a country and spreads, there is a product which can vaccinate people against this threat (this TERROR). that is, there is a pharmaceutical product, Tamiflu, which is capable of dealing with a particular strain of avian influenza. and yet there is a strange conflict-of-interest because Donald Rumsfeld, the .US Secretary of "DEFENSE" is a shareholder of the company that makes this vaccine: Rumsfeld's growing stake in Tamiflu Defense Secretary, ex-chairman of flu treatment rights holder, sees portfolio value growing. October 31, 2005: 10:55 AM EST By Nelson D. Schwartz, Fortune senior writer http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/31/news/newsmakers/fortune_rumsfeld/ "NEW YORK (Fortune) - The prospect of a bird flu outbreak may be panicking people around the globe, but it's proving to be very good news for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other politically connected investors in Gilead Sciences, the California biotech company that owns the rights to Tamiflu, the influenza remedy that's now the most-sought after drug in the world." thus, the threat of this is equate to the threat of terrorism or of more terrorist attacks, or of United 93 "soon coming to you". it becomes a profitable business model if all of the sudden millions of people need what you have and you have a monopoly and have cornered the market, etc. that there is great human suffering involved is no matter, if one is a corporate machine it is beyond this level of details and is an amoral or rather immoral equation by which to proceed from A->B. in which this point B is Neocon utopia which to most people would be considered hell on earth. So Mr. Rumsfeld is directly connected into such schemes in which the misrepresentations of the status quo 'reality, inc' gives a historical 'benefit of the doubt' to such actions as being on behalf of the human citizenry and the governance of the state itself, it's "DEFENSE" so to say, and not unequivocally opposed to constitutional democracy, human rights, etc. this is to say, that this is in the binary logic of neoconservative ideology: rationalized as somehow "good" in the scheme of things. that is, having rationalized evil, and the slippery slope of this, where one loses their own humanity as a result. and if you've not lost it yet, there is still hope: renounce your ideology or perish. though some have already chosen, and their fate is sealed, and will soon be arriving. if one then takes into consideration the torture camps of Mr. Rumsfeld and secret prison networks and it may be 'seen' in a considerably different light, if this is a question of misrepresentation of the basic storyline itself-- and any corruption within its plot would corrupt the overall story itself. that is, if something is built on lies, it cannot withstand the introduction of truth into its structuring, else it would collapse. consistency is all critical. else, the structure would give way, as in an earthquake or other event, where the forces and momentums could not be held within the building as engineered. thus, while Guantanamo could be closed by Neoconservatives, it would have to be done so as to fit into the plot, into the storyline, it could not become another version of events. it has to be self-consistent. in terms of pure ideology, and enable the ideology to grow, evolve. that this Neoconservative worldview is the devolution of human civilization is now entirely self-evident. another dimension of this false shadow play is the invasion of Iraq as if it were occurring to liberate Iraq from a 'tyrant' in Saddam Hussein, a dictator who the .US government and Rumsfeld himself created and gave weapons of mass destruction to use 'against his own people'. including being a 'mass murder' etc. sound familiar? Bird Flu'ing your own people? Executing those on flight 93 and the thousands in the WTC on 9/11 and tens of thousands in .IQ and elsewhere at the hand of Mr. Rumsfeld-- this is somehow omitted from the official storyline and how it is being represented by corporate mass media. by President Bush's and Rumsfeld's own definitions: they themselves are dictators and terrorists. murdering your own people, assassinations, biological weapons, etc. in other words: by their own criteria they are themselves both armed and dangerous and are not going to be giving up the ghost, until held to account for their actions against the human state. that is, that there is no ambiguity to rely on, no words that can protect the fascists, no laws that will defend such actions, and that this is indeed a war against civilians by a corporate dicatorship. and so, while Saddam Hussein may be placed on trial for 'crimes against humanity' as a dictator, he is being tried by the .US government, which is a corporate dictatorship itself: and the absolute failure of the 'legal' courts to convict Mr. Hussein, as a human being, brings up what is a critically important aspect of the nature of reality: a greater evil must exist than Saddam Hussein, in which his prosecution pales in comparison to the evil which seeks to make an example of him, against the very nature of events as they exist, beyond lies, beyond deception, beyond illusion. that is, that the facts themselves and the reasoned truth have instead inverted this attempt to rationalize justice as the punishment of lesser evil as the greater truth, which has completely failed to allow such a fiction to claim itself as fact. and in defiance to this, Saddam Hussein's trial stands in stark contrast to the 'official' storyline and calls into question - 'how, on earth, could one not convict Saddam Hussein in a court of law, during an occupation, when controlling the entire apparatus?'... the only answer here is that the truth is the greatest defense, and the greatest offense, and there are greater and lesser evils, and if making Saddam Hussein out to be the greatest evil, it would be against the true nature of events, as they exist, 'on the ground', as they are experienced -- and this calls into question 'the truth' of the .US government in prosecuting Saddam from a position of greater truth, and not of greater lies, for it defies any other explanation how this could be the case: unless, in some divine moment, that the truth stands in defiance of the greatest falsity that exists. and that, even Saddam Hussein retains some humanity against this machine, which is thrown into relied, which constrasts with a larger agenda which has him as a character with its global plot. thus, the trial of Saddam is a media spectacle, though in the way that it is outside of the total control of the .US version of events and the Neoconservative ideological control. instead, it is able to detourne this event and invert the symbolic order, whereby a mirror is placed upon observers, as to why the greater truth is not becoming the basis for law--- that is, unless it actually is: unless, in the failure to convict Mr. Hussein under the existing circumstances is a testament to the falsity of events as they are being misrepresented in a larger scheme-of-things. this is to say, Saddam is a symbol of everything that is opposite as to what it appears in the official storyline and stands against the interpretation via Neoconservative viewpoints, without calling this into question, doubt. if the .US military has been betrayed and has pursued such an agenda, there will be a decision to make as to who you stand with, .US citizens and humanity, or the terrorists, fascists, and neocons. those who have perpetrated the terrorist violence on 9/11, will pay the ultimate price. and, using this same societal lens of the spectacle- the cosmic punishment will fit the cosmic crime. you are now given a choice: renounce your fascist ideology and totally submit to human authority or you will be held accountable for your crimes against humanity. that is, get on your hands and knees and repent in total submission, and reclaim your humanity by redeeming yourself by good works. else, those who are involved _will be going to Guantanamo Prison themselves, for an extended stay and some interrogation, after it is emptied of its present victims -- and their lives are served and rebuilt by those true to the ideas and principles of the United States of America. those who have orchestrated 9/11, your fate is largely sealed, though if you totally submit and help dismantle this network, you could redeem yourself and aid this holy war of humanity against this inhuman machinery that you've pledged your allegiance to. you've otherwise earned yourself a one-way ticket to the International Space Station (ISS) whereby, those Neoconservatives worthy of the honor, will be held until judgement day. a series of booster rockets is hereby on order by which to launch these evildoers into the cold and hellish vacuum of space, to get them off the planet until there spectacular demise is announced: that they will only return to Earth as only they should: as the flaming ball of fire as they burn up in attempting to reenter the atmosphere, O Icarus! one and all. how you have betrayed the planet and its people and will stand as symbolic of this for all time. you have been warned- and these are no idle threats. for all others, do something good and will your necktie to the goodwill-- you will not be needing it very much longer. and, as for a question for national intelligence: 'what don't we know?': you do not know love. it is for all of these reasons above that the next post will address black flag operations, which is based upon this false representation of the existing symbolic order of the .US, including the 'stars and stripes' of the .US flag, which now represent this tyranny, terror, and fascist governance. it is to equate the existing .US flag, as subverted, with that of the Nazis, and these are now false colors against the very principles of constitutional democracy. therefore, this must be symbolically inverted and the .US flag of the True America, that which is based on truth, justice, equality, reason, love, and sacrifice, will acknowledge that this color has been bled from our state, and no longer represents the human population nor serves its principles, goals, ideals, nor dreams. we need a new flag, in order to share an understanding of the degree to which this truth prevails. and challenges the status quo and its illusions, based on exploiting visual imagery to deceive, to subvert, which benefits from the trust once deserved, now which has become our own treachery. against ourselves, our citizens. the .US flag dyed black will serve those who fight on the side of humanity, against this pure and total evil. officers swords are no longer ceremonial, sharpen them, and prepare to use them. GUANTANAMO BAY PRISON // public service announcement OPEN for international human rights & Red Cross inspections CLOSE for violating human rights in the name of democracy # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net