Ivo Skoric on Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:21:21 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Re: Fw: New articles from Bender's Immigration Daily |
This is really far-reaching. Not only it opens a path to US permanent residence for all Yugoslav/Serbian draft-dodgers, but it also makes possible for the attorneys of US soldiers, that go awol in Iraq and Afghanistan, in not so distant future, to use the argument of Abu Ghraib in their defense. Good one. ivo On 27 Feb 2007 at 11:36, Maglich, Marko wrote: First case listed here is interesting. Marko C. Maglich Immigration Practice White & Case LLP -----Original Message----- From: admin@bibdaily.com <admin@bibdaily.com> To: Maglich, Marko Sent: Tue Feb 27 10:01:15 2007 Subject: New articles from Bender's Immigration Daily The following new articles have been added to Bender's Immigration Bulletin <http://www.bibdaily.com> : Visit http://www.bibdaily.com to read the details. NEW ARTICLES ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Second Circuit on Forced Conscription "In denying the petitioner's motion to reconsider, the Board of Immigration Appeals failed to consider one of the petitioner's arguments: that future imprisonment for fleeing conscription in the Yugoslavian army at a time when the army was committing human rights abuses constitutes persecution. The petition for rehearing is granted and the cause is remanded to the BIA for it to consider in the first instance this argument and any other question it considers appropriate." Nikovic v. Gonzales, Feb. 22, 2007. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: W.D. Penn. on Jurisdiction "Delays of the sort alleged here may, indeed, be "inevitable and becoming more frequent in light of heightened security concerns in the post-911 world." Mustafa, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8047, at **15-17. Just as we must be vigilant about security, however, we must also be vigilant against the undue narrowing of access to our courts in the name of that same security. The inevitability or necessity of processing delays does not require that the courts, without clear legislative direction, act to propagate those delays." Duan v. Zamberry, Feb. 23, 2007. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Sincerely, Daniel M. Kowalski Editor <http://www.lexisnexis.com> "LexisNexis...it's how you know." To be removed from this list click here <http://www.bibdaily.com/index.cgi?rm=Email&id=210&email=mmaglich@whit ecase.com> . ====================================================================== This e-mail communication is confidential and is intended only for the individual(s) or entity named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication to others. Please notify the sender that you have received this e-mail in error by replying to the e-mail or by telephoning (212) 819-8200 during the hours of 9:30am - 5:30pm (EST). Any other time please call (212) 819-7664. Please then delete the e- mail and any copies of it. Thank you. ====================================================================== # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net