Ivo Skoric on Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:21:21 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

<nettime> Re: Fw: New articles from Bender's Immigration Daily


This is really far-reaching. Not only it opens a path to US permanent 
residence for all Yugoslav/Serbian draft-dodgers, but it also makes 
possible for the attorneys of US soldiers, that go awol in Iraq and 
Afghanistan, in not so distant future, to use the argument of Abu 
Ghraib in their defense. Good one.
ivo

On 27 Feb 2007 at 11:36, Maglich, Marko wrote:

First case listed here is interesting.
Marko C. Maglich
Immigration Practice
White & Case LLP

-----Original Message-----
From: admin@bibdaily.com <admin@bibdaily.com>
To: Maglich, Marko
Sent: Tue Feb 27 10:01:15 2007
Subject: New articles from Bender's Immigration Daily

The following new articles have been added to Bender's Immigration 
Bulletin <http://www.bibdaily.com> :

Visit http://www.bibdaily.com to read the details.

NEW ARTICLES
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Second Circuit on Forced Conscription
"In denying the petitioner's motion to reconsider, the Board of 
Immigration Appeals failed to consider one of the petitioner's 
arguments: that future imprisonment for fleeing conscription in the 
Yugoslavian army at a time when the army was committing human rights 
abuses constitutes persecution. The petition for rehearing is granted 
and the cause is remanded to the BIA for it to consider in the first 
instance this argument and any other question it considers 
appropriate." Nikovic v. Gonzales, Feb. 22, 2007.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

W.D. Penn. on Jurisdiction
"Delays of the sort alleged here may, indeed, be "inevitable and 
becoming more frequent in light of heightened security concerns in 
the post-911 world." Mustafa, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8047, at **15-17. 
Just as we must be vigilant about security, however, we must also be 
vigilant against the undue narrowing of access to our courts in the 
name of that same security. The inevitability or necessity of 
processing delays does not require that the courts, without clear 
legislative direction, act to propagate those delays." Duan v. 
Zamberry, Feb. 23, 2007.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::




Sincerely,
Daniel M. Kowalski
Editor

<http://www.lexisnexis.com> "LexisNexis...it's how you know."
To be removed from this list click here 
<http://www.bibdaily.com/index.cgi?rm=Email&id=210&email=mmaglich@whit
ecase.com> .

======================================================================

This e-mail communication is confidential and is intended only for the
individual(s) or entity named above and others who have been 
specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of 
this communication to others. Please notify the sender that you have 
received this e-mail in error by replying to the e-mail or by 
telephoning (212) 819-8200 during the hours of 9:30am - 5:30pm (EST). 
Any other time please call (212) 819-7664. Please then delete the e-
mail and any copies of it. Thank you. 

======================================================================



#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net