carl guderian on Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:21:10 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Virtual Dreams, Real Politics |
Attention conservation notice: this is a rant. Oh noes, the ideology-free Internet turns out to be not only a military project, but specifically an ideological reaction to CyberCommunists plotting Red revolution (apologies to Velvet Acid Christ) and not just a defense against atomic attack. Embarrassing for Californian cyber-hippies, thinking themselves "post-ideological" libertarians, already downplaying the internet's military (subsidy) antecedents, only to be further tagged with anti-Communist dogma. Gentlemen, gentlemen! We must not allow...a knowledge gap! An RFC specifying IP packet headers that spelled out "In God We Trust" in hex would just be icing on the cake, wouldn't it? Hard to upload yer consciousness with all that baggage. The Singularity just receded further into the horizon. As the Soup Nazi might have said, no cyber- transcendence for *you.* Seriously, if the Interweb has accommodated local regimes (China, Bush's America) more often than it's transformed them (erm...), you have to wonder just how big a threat an internet would really have been to the Soviet system. If Manuel Castells is right that the Soviet system had no real pipeline between military technology and the consumer market like in the US, then a Soviet internet could have been limited, like the real internet of the 1970s and 1980s (or the Iraqi internet in the 1990s)--minimal, with e-mail addresses with bangs (!'s), a few newsgroups, some Gopher and Archie sites). It could have had a moderating, not a revolutionary effect, on the USSR. There was a tiny Soviet internet, registered as .su in 1990 . People make a big deal of the Fax Effect in stopping the August 1991 attempt to stop Perestroika and bring back the Brezhnev 1970s, as if there's some sort of historical inevitability to communications- driven revolutions. But coups are more contingent than people think. Because they succeeded, people think they would always succeed. The 1953 Iran coup, for example, almost collapsed. The abortive Venezuelan CIA-sponsored coup certainly did. The Soviet plotters were mounting yesterday's (re)coup, like Khruschev and Zhukov shut down Beria's power grab in 1953. But these Great Patriotic War vets didn't see how the USSR had changed, had become collectively more intelligent since the 1970s and certainly since the 1940s. But going back to the 1960s, suppose the Soviet bureaucrats hadn't lost their nerve...GosNet 1967! On the 50th anniversary of the Revolution, Socialism scores another triumph on the wires like it did in space 10 years ago! Academicians swapping recipes and Beatles guitar chords in the 1970s beef up the technocratic class that came up in the 1980s. GosNet 1987 connects the democratic people's republics of Eastern Europe to Africa to the Middle East to Cuba! In the USSR, perestroika comes but the Soviet Union continues, Berlin Wall gone, sure, maybe devolving to a Soviet Confederation, a sort of Yugoslavic Eastern Europe, soldiering on in the name of Marxist- Leninism, a better place to live and denying Reaganite triumphalists the spectacular victory of capitalism over the Communism in our timeline. Dare I hope for a new sci-fi / slipstream genre: Commiepunk? Carl On 9-jul-2007, at 17:01, richard@imaginaryfutures.net wrote: > Virtual Dreams, Real Politics > > http://www.imaginaryfutures.net/ > http://www.opendemocracy.net/globalisation/visions_reflections/ > virtual_politics > > ?What are we fighting Communism for? We are the most Communist people > in world history.? > - Marshall McLuhan, 1969. > > In 1961, at its 22nd Congress, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union > formally adopted the goal of spreading the benefits of computerisation > across the whole economy. Over the next two decades, the information <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net