Morlock Elloi on Sun, 3 Feb 2008 04:40:35 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> The Ideology of Free Culture and the Grammar of Sabotage |
It is true that buzzwords themselves do not guarantee content-free texts. What are buzzwords anyway? They are indices into dictionary entries available only to those "in" the field. Often these entries do not bring any semantic value, after all only so many new concepts are invented every year, with buzzword production outnumbering the real demand by many orders of magnitude. Their only use is to certify that you've been there. Like bumper stickers (I wonder if authors of these texts are also in bumper stickers?) So filtering would have to be done in the same way e-mail spam filtering is done today: correlation from a large number of sources; blacklisting; and only then keywords ("post marxism" instead of "viagra"). It's a hard problem, and my feeble word-pair frequency attempt cannot solve it. For example, what follows here is a permutation of the original text with the same word-pair fingerprint. Does it have more, less or the same content as the original? (It definitely is more original :-) == start == Against the digital culture in our wallet A closer Bataille is vast but also the same excess, of digitalism. What I call this sense Creative commons do not a large torrents of a religious sect it is not produced: by the asymmetrical arrow this text tries to others command: surplus value or a market in as the ghost of each generate and complicity of autonomous commons, economy and can be built and especially from the crisis European media discourse, Bataille himself considered a new theory of your work behind and the dot com bubble exploited a dynamic space of the amphibious nature of the market of its commons. Part of material energy. In cognitive economy each other; do this text tries to remind the others command: flows. The line of sabotage same old Fordism. Benkler take for producers or more interesting than a specific living Energy do not binary but it, is immaterial, rent end the compensation system of there is not help to deal harvest or simply an universal political arena in detail; economical flows a parasite. Yet between immaterial surplus; of the material and its parasites: the production. On the latter commons only in Berlin based never the music. The very foundation of code. Profit. The owners of fulfilling the owning class is it help to be compensated: survives in mind? Today activists are many of the flat paradigm is percent secure and Adwords. Today both copyright there is referred to others command. Reading authors like, a furious but on time to a sublimation of the other like tree branches and digital dream: eating at the copyright regime and material process of sabotage against the displaced multitudes to design the hegemony of organisation: of server, a music the Commons Free to the parasite. Rent, real commons grey sides. But constantly tries to include new forms of cooperation do not only passive and may provide his perspective is defined by the commons commercial use for other; Creative commons licenses are starting point of surplus. Under a chain of the means of information, quite a more frank question for the ghost of the classical theory forms of hardware, the digital watermark once the material infrastructure Culture gathers all those who are simply co immaterial and Lessig, a Google seems to have a film maker (you are exploited by a knowledge free space symmetry of material vectors). Copyright, there is shared of technological substratum. Economically digitalism is to traditional forms of multitude of autonomous and immaterial parasite metropolis real common stock exchange value is a mutual Gift economy and crucial for no acknowledgement of agenda society and physically consumed by Negri and virtuous space time to Judaism, Christianity, Pythagoreans and infrastructure in digitalism seems to The more rich in production. The first Hackers Conference in network. Google provides the classical theory of organisation of copyfarleft a contemporary economy and Vercellone make finally, the positive gesture of freeculturalism is the immaterial plane, and those who are paid alternative and the friction between magic and more competition. Rullani's the do networks; the Commons against the means of excess of natural energies; contradictions of commercial use supported by some CC and complicity of the compensation without a stronger, but simply an apology of flows: a commons allow not be paid in are simply it is consequently constantly tries to sell more on: time as patents, copyrights to reproduce, the Commons as the a fetishism of energy. There is a subordinate the sharing but provides in the gentrification of the relation between the composition hyper celebrated by a new nickname, they are immaterial despite the commons as Marx spotlighted commodity value, that CC initiative to sell more on surplus in A contemporary media Culture conceived the friction between immaterial parasite functions first before the case of the Commons allow not starting point of the internet is one of excess, of intellectual property financial value, only virtually free culture software engineer or more generally the A genealogy of workers or exchange of workers ownership of copyright commodity fetishism has become molecular the old Fordism. As the commons, among the specular to describe his the three forces is fragile and afterwards our tools and economical flows is split into networks and slowing down of a pure symmetry of diffusion a rent (can also The capital a diverse therapeutic doubt remains for those who are many items of information)? Only to dense parasitic economy has been described. The wealth of online social production may provide the parasite parasites has to reproduce, have to create use of knowledge based on surplus? In a generic digital copies. At the radical understanding of this single arrow, this the celebration of organisation of Free Software movement are in different rules for the institution of capital. The commons. For Rullani is not exploit wage labour appears Like in production. There is regime and immaterial parasite: belongs to the name say that an autonomous and cooperation the parasitic income an effective way. The link of cognitive capitalism proprietary the copyright earnings. Third, a furtive tactical declassing declassement, of surplus? Bataille described Society and cooperation and economical flows; is produced on the Free. What is focused more competition should be marked, with users and drastic analysis; school of the decline of Kevin Kelly's digitalist media culture Literature on Second the passage of the whole of surplus in authorized sharing but do digital transmission would be the Autonomist Marxism has to the dystopian version of signs and freedom Vercellone a social equilibrium. Against the digital culture in our wallet. What kind of rent of political dreams, the working are creative Commons, based immaterial parasite Michel Serres catches the immaterial spaces of the arrow this is a as it runs. Less fictional world building a new toolbox tax. Technological and not be established around a much Software, and the latest manifestation of workers copyright there is fragile and digitalised in other autonomisation of freeculturalism. It was the immaterial value and tends production and another for entrepreneurial freedom to any kind of the wealth of technology in this model to make a growing criticism. Third, a strong blog, a license a pure symmetry of capitalism instead of any revolutionary potential it yourself is more interesting than On the new projects and other examples of any form of Logos, this is easier, as the form of a question rises; relation between intellectual labour the world a larger specific model of the cognitive workforce, capitalism; products are alternative and self organisation of a market of the immaterial parasite has been replaced by Stewart Brand, information networks and Adwords. == end == --- ruth weismann <weismann.ruth@gmail.com> wrote: > the idea of a dictionary of "standardized inter-bred vernacular" is > very interesting! Just in general, concerning theory, I also quite > sometimes have the feeling that certain expressions are just used but > don?t mean anything at all. This is an interesting phenonmena that > should be examined closer <...> end (of original message) Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows: ___________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org