alexander nikolic on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:50:39 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> In conversation with African Maximalism |
Dear list, next week one of the first shows about art and public space in Nairobi, is going to be opened. I had a conversation with the curators, which i want to share with you. More information you'll find also on http://www.african-maximalism.org/ here the conversation: a.n.: Thanks that you invited me for the show, it?s possible that i have quite a developed idea, about art and public space in general, but how and why did you choose such a topic, and what is there relevant for you, in terms of Nairobi? AM: In the sphere of local contemporary art practice it seems that artists are not engaging with public space, hence the title as a provocation. But if you further interrogate local cultural production, and understand art in public space as the performance of cultural expression in public, than Nairobi is a goldmine. a.n: What?s provocative about the title, and by the way, do you know the story about the gold of the socialists international? If it would have been found by the capitalists, it would have turned in their hands, into coal. AM: Of course the title suggests that art practice in public space does not exist, or is an almost utopian fantasy, but actually this is not the case. It is merely that the local institutions, which incidentally are almost exclusively controlled by foreign interests, do not showcase or represent this form of local art production. a.n: Maybe, we get later back to the foreign interests, but what is your goal? AM: Our goal is twofold, to disrupt the current practice of the local art institutions, and shift their focus to recognise a local cultural practice, which is simply not featured. However, neither do we seek simply to celebrate an ?exotic? art practice. By including these artists within this space, we also intend to challenge them, and to stimulate within them further questioning of their own practice. a.n: And the danger that the gold could turn into coal? AM: Than we crush it into diamonds. a.n: Ok, can I be a bit polemic about that, and ask you, would you redistribute that diamonds, to the mothers of the people who went missing in that public space in the last two years? AM: We are very aware of working in an environment, where thousands of young men simply disappear. We don?t think our show can solve that problem. But what our show can do, is to analyse what is permitted in public space, and stimulate an interdisciplinary discourse between artists, activists and theoreticians. So, in answer to your question, the wealth we distribute is the wealth of understanding. a.n: But you know, I never met more than 30 people at openings here, and even although I?m not living here, I already have the impression that I know most of them.. but maybe I?m wrong. AM: Well, that is exactly point. The artfield is limited, which is why we hope that this show can create a space for interdisciplinary discourse and cross-pollinate between different fields of knowledge. Regarding the field of Art, the time has long passed when galleries and exhibitions are about looking at well crafted objects. We understand our role as catalysts of ideas, connectors of different thoughts, creators of situations in which viewers themselves create and imagine alternative possibilities to the present. a.n: I mean, this is not new, and to me sounds like you are simply exporting European avant-garde thought from the 1960?s and planting it in a new field. In fact, is this not simply the latest version of a long history of cultural imperialism? Where is the African in your Maximalism? AM: (Laughter)? Whilst an accusation of Cultural Imperialism is to some extent valid, ultimately it is short-sighted. It is true that we use tools and strategies gleaned from Contemporary Art discourse, and this discourse does originate in the Global North. But, this is just what they are; tools, which can be abandoned if they don?t work. The last decade of global culture has not proved the theories of Cultural Homogenisation to be correct. People are cultural agents and chose and select from the mainstream of culture. Hiphop may have originated stateside but to see Kenyan hiphop as simply derivative of that culture is to misconceive contemporary culture. a.n: Well, I?m not sure if I buy this? but I will hold further judgement until I see what you have to offer in the show. Afro Max, it?s been a pleasure. AM: Karibu. See you on the 13th. a.n: Alexander Nikolic AM: African Maximalism http://www.african-maximalism.org/ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org