miltosmanetas on Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:50:08 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> What do you think about .art? |
I absolutely agree. .art is simply ridiculous, who wants to be called .art? Only those who are "trying hard", or amateurs without real passion. From the other side, .art is a perfect package for a meta-conceptual artist to acquire and do yet another one of those pseudo-dada art operations. In either case, its totally uninterested and better to be left to the regular market. Ps: I also believe that the "classic"- and "realistic"- domainname extension for art, is simply .Com Miltos Manetas Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone -----Original Message----- From: Heiko Recktenwald <heikorecktenwald@googlemail.com> Sender: nettime-l-bounces@mail.kein.org Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:33:28 To: nettime's_roving_reporter<nettime-l@kein.org> Subject: Re: <nettime> What do you think about .art? IMHO one should never call oneself an artist, .art is .kitsch <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org