Dmytri Kleiner on Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:04:00 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> 'Occupy' as a business model: The emerging open-source civilisation |
Hey Ben, just quickly, first of all I don't intend to dictate answers to you questions, my question is economic, how to allow labour to retain more of the product of it's labour, your question is administrative, and that is, of course, something that's best discovered through practise. In any case, my own thoughts, in the case of the peer production license/ copyfarleft, is that there could be collectively owned collection societies that collects on behalf of all its artists, and does use this money to fund commons-based projects. However, even if the artists themselves kept all proceeds from non-free licensing, copyfarleft still allows their work to remain available for commons-based production by others, unlike the traditional "non-commercial" licences which it's meant to replace. As funny side note, I just posted this in another forum:So, Alan Avans, Chris Cook ... no comments? At least let me know if I've got my X's and Y's right. (I need to make another wonkish friend who has the initials BB so I can say I will consult the ABCs).
So hello Ben Berkinbine! Best, On 12.03.2012 23:38, Ben Birkinbine wrote:
Just a quick point of clarification/elaboration, and I apologize if I've missed it in earlier posts.
<...> -- Dmyri Kleiner Venture Communist # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org