Geert Lovink on Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:07:21 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Researching BWPWAP: The Reinvention of Research as Participatory Practice |
Exclusive Gonzo Circus essay ?Time-wars? by Mark Fisher http://www.gonzocircus.com/incubate-special-exclusief-essay-tijdstrijd-door-mark-fisher-k-punk/ Leading radical blogger and professor ?cultural analysis? Mark Fisher (aka k-punk) is one of the keynote speakers at this year?s Incubate DIY-conference. He is the author of the acclaimed ?Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?? and publishes in New Statesman, Frieze and The Wire. Daily he posts his comments on twitter as kpunk99. In his work he refers to an autonomist framework, incorporating elements from workerism, post-marxism and anarchism. Mark Fisher wrote the thought-provoking essay ?Time-wars? exclusively for Incubate and Gonzo (circus). There is a Dutch translation available on the Gonzo website. == Time rather than money is the currency in the recent science fiction film In Time. At the age of 25, the citizens in the future world the film depicts are given only a year more to live. To survive any longer, they must earn extra time. The decadent rich have centuries of empty time available to fritter away, while the poor are always only days or hours away from death. In Time is, in effect, the first science fiction film about precarity ? a condition that describes an existential precidament as much as it refers to a particular way of organising work. At the most simple level, precarity is one consequence of the ?post-Fordist? restructuring of work that began in the late 1970s: the turn away from fixed, permanent jobs to ways of working that are increasingly casualised. Yet even those within relatively stable forms of employment are not immune from precarity. Many workers now have to periodically revalidate their status via systems of ?continuous professional development?; almost all work, no matter how menial, involves self-surveillance systems in which the worker is required to assess their own performance. Pay is increasingly correlated to output, albeit an output that is no longer easily measurable in material terms. For most workers, there is no such thing as the long term. As sociologist Richard Sennett put it in his book The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, the post-Fordist worker ?lives in a world marked ? by short-term flexibility and flux ? Corporations break up or join together, jobs appear and disappear, as events lacking connection.? (30) Throughout history, humans have learned to come to terms with the traumatic upheavals caused by war or natural disasters, but ?[w]hat?s peculiar about uncertainty today,? Sennett points out, ?is that it exists without any looming historical disaster; instead it is woven into the everyday practices of a vigorous capitalism.? It isn?t only work that has become more tenuous. The neoliberal attacks on public services, welfare programmes and trade unions mean that we are increasingly living in a world deprived of security or solidarity. The consequence of the normalisation of uncertainty is a permanent state of low-level panic. Fear, which attaches to particular objects, is replaced by a more generalised anxiety, a constant twitching, an inability to settle. The uncertainty of work is intensified by digital communication technology. As soon as there is email, there are no longer working hours nor a workplace. What characterises the present moment more than our anxious checking ? of our messages, which may bring opportunities or demands (often both at the same time), or, more abstractly, of our status, which, like the stock market is constantly under review, never finally resolved? We are very far from the ?society of leisure? that was confidently predicted in the 1970s. Contrary to the hopes raised at that time, technology has not liberated us from work. As Federico Campagna writes in his article ?Radical Atheism?, published on the Through Europe website. ?In the current age of machines ? humans finally have the possibility of devolving most productive processes to technological apparatus, while retaining all outcomes for themselves. In other words, the (first) world currently hosts all the necessary pre-conditions for the realization of the old autonomist slogan ?zero work / full income/ all production / to automation?. Despite all this, 21st century Western societies are still torn by the dusty, capitalist dichotomy which opposes a tragically overworked section of population against an equally tragically unemployed one.? Campagna?s call for a ?radial atheism? is based on the recognition that the precariousness that cannot be eliminated is that of life and the body. If there is no afterlife, then our time is finite. Curiously, however, we subjects of late capitalism act as if there is infinite time to waste on work. Work looms over us as never before. ?In an eccentric and an extreme society like ours,? argue Carl Cederström and Peter Fleming in their book Dead Man Working, ?working has assumed a universal presence ? a ?worker?s society in the worst sense of the term ? where even the unemployed and children become obsessed with it.? (2) Work now colonises weekends, late evenings, even our dreams. ?Under Fordism, weekends and leisure time were still relatively untouched,? Cederström and Fleming point out. ?Today, however, capital seeks to exploit our sociality in all spheres of work. When we all become ?human capital? we not only have a job, or perform a job. We are the job.? Given all of this, it is clear that most political struggles at the moment amount to a war over time. The generalised debt crisis that hangs over all areas of capitalist life and culture ? from banks to housing and student funding ? is ultimately about time. Averting the alleged catastrophe (of the end of capitalism) will heighten the apocalyptic temporality of everyday life, as the anticipation of catastrophe gives way to a sense that we are already living through the catastrophe and it, like work, will never end. The increase of debt justifies the extending of working hours and working life, with retirement age being pushed ever further back. We are in a state of harrassed busyness from which ? we are now promised ? there will never be any relief. The state of reactive panic in which most of us find ourselves is not an accidental side-effect of post-Fordist labour. It is highly functional for capital that our time is not only quantitatively short but qualitatively fragmented, bitty. We are required to live in the condition that Linda Stone has called ?continous partial attention?, where our attention is habitually distributed across multiple communication platforms. As Franco ?Bifo? Berardi has argued, we now live in the tension between the infinity of cyberspace and the vulnerable finitude of the body and the nervous system. ?The acceleration of information exchange has produced and is producing an effect of a pathological type on the individual human mind and even more on the collective mind,? Berardi writes in Precarious Rhapsody. ?Individuals are not in a position to process the immense and always growing mass of information that enters their computers, their cell phones, their television screens, their electronic diaries and their heads. However, it seems indispensable to follow, recognise, evaluate, process all this information if you want to be efficient, competitive, victorious. ? The necessary time for paying attention to the fluxes of information is lacking.? The consequence is a strange kind of existential state, in which exhaustion bleeds into insomniac overstimulation (no matter how tired we are, there is still time for one more click) and enjoyment and anxiety co-exist (the urge to check emails, for instance, is both something we must do for work and a libidinal compulsion, a psychoanalytic drive that is never satisfied no matter how many messages we receive). The fact that the smart phone makes cyberspace available practically anywhere at anytime means that boredom (or at least the old style, ?Fordist? boredom) has effectively been eliminated from social life. Yet boredom, like death, posed existential challenges that are far more easily deferred in the always-on cyberspatial environment. Ultimately, communicative capitalism does not vanquish boredom so much as it ?sublates? it, seeming to destroy it only to preserve it in a new synthesis. The characteristic affective tonality for the insomniac drift of cyberspace, in which there is always one more click to make, one more update to check, combines fascination with boredom. We are bored even as we are fascinated, and the limitless distraction allows us to evade confronting death ? even as death is closing in on us. No doubt this chronic shortage of time goes some way to accounting for the stalled and inertial quality of culture in recent years. The neoliberal gambit was that the destruction of social security would have a dynamic effect on culture and the economy, liberating an entrepreneurial spirit that was inhibited by the red tape of bureaucratic social democratic institutions. The reality, however, is that innovation requires certain forms of stability. The disintegration of social democracy has had a dampening, rather than a dynamic, effect on culture in highly neoliberalized countries such as the UK. Fredric Jameson?s claims that late capitalist culture would be given over to pastiche and retrospection have turned out to be extraordinarily prophetic. We?ve grown so accustomed to repetition and recycling that we no longer notice them. Yet it?s no surprise that this is the case. New cultural production requires a use of time that communicative capitalism is profoundly hostile towards. Most social energy is sucked into the vortex of late capitalist labour and its vast simulation of productivity. Innovation depends upon an absorbed (rather than distracted) drift; but it is increasingly difficult to muster the attentional resources necessary for such immersion. Cyberspatial urgencies ? the smartphone?s flashing red light, the siren call of its alert ? function like trance-inhibitors or alarm clocks that keep waking us out of collective dreaming. In these conditions, intellectual work can only be undertaken on a short-term basis. Only prisoners have time to read, and if you want to engage in a twenty-year long research project funded by the state, you will have to kill someone. To understand the time-crisis, we only have to compare the current situation with the height of punk and post-punk in the UK and the US. It?s no accident that the efflorescence of punk and post-punk culture happened at a time when cheap and squatted property was available in London and New York. Now, simply to afford to pay rent in either city entails giving up most of your time and energy to work. The delirious rise in property prices over the last twenty years is probably the single most important cause of cultural conservatism in the UK and the US. In the UK, much of the infrastructure which indirectly supported cultural production has been systematically dismantled by successive neoliberal governments. Most of the innovations in British popular music which happened between the 60s and the 90s would have been unthinkable without the indirect funding provided by social housing, unemployment benefit and student grants. These developments precisely opened up a kind of time that is now increasingly difficult to access: a time temporarily freed from the pressure to pay rent or the mortgage; an experimental time, in which the outcomes of activities could neither be predicted nor guaranteed; a time which might turn out to be wasted, but which might equally yield new concepts, perceptions, ways of being. It is this kind of time, not the harassed time of the business entrepreneur, which gives rise to the new. This kind of time, where the collective mind can unfurl, also allows the social imagination to flourish. The neoliberal era ? the time when, we were repeatedly told, there was no alternative ? has been characterised by a massive deterioration of social imagination, an incapacity to even conceive of different ways to work, produce and consume. It?s now clear that, from the start (and with good reason) neoliberalism declared war on this alternative mode of time. It remains tireless in its propagation of resentment against those few fugitives who can still escape the treadmill of debt and endless work, promising to ensure that soon, they too will be condemned to performing interminable, meaningless labour ? as if the solution to the current stagnation lay in more work, rather than an escape from the cult of work. If there is to be any kind of future, it will depend on our winning back the uses of time that neoliberalism has sought to close off and make us forget. Bibliography Berardi, Franco, Precarious Rhapsody: Semiocapitalism and the pathologies of the post-alpha generation, London: Minor Compositions, 2009. Campagna, Federico, ?Radical Atheism?, http://th-rough.eu/writers/campagna-eng/radical-atheism. Cederström, Carl and Fleming, Peter, Dead Man Working, Winchester: Zer0 books, 2012. Sennett, Richard, The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, New York/ London: WW Norton, 1998. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org