Nettime mailing list archives

<nettime> Review of Gregory Sholette's "Dark Matter"
Molly Hankwitz on Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:20:45 +0200 (CEST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

<nettime> Review of Gregory Sholette's "Dark Matter"

Dark Matter by Gregory Sholette: Mass Artistic Resistance to the
Neo-Liberalization of Everyday Life

By Molly Hankwitz

 Finally, a history of collective precarity from a politicized artist.
Author/writer, Gregory Sholette, in the final paragraph of Dark Matter: Art
and Politics in the Age of Enterprise Culture, at last clarifies the
frequently cited metaphor of ?zombies? and enormous digital casts, which
likes of Annalee Newitz? have been preoccupied with in terms of popular
culture and most noticeably, the big budget extravaganza digital films of
recent decades. He writes:

*We go on picking the rags, but every now and again, this other social
[non] productivity appears to mobilize its own redundancy, seems to
acknowledge that it is indeed just so much surplus---talent, labor,
subjectivity, even sheer physical-genetic materiality?and in so doing frees
itself from even attempting to be usefully productive for capitalism?,
though all the while identifying itself with a far larger ocean of ?dark
matter?, that ungainly surfeit of seemingly useless actors and activity
that the market views as waste, or perhaps at best as a raw,
interchangeable resource for biometric information and crowd sourcing. The
archive has split open. We are its dead capital. It is the dawn of the dead.

This blatant appeal to the use-value of our necrophilia, artistic waste,
the products of our labor and time, runs throughout an historical text,
alternately conscious of its own limitations and brilliantly pervasive in
its political critique and arts research. Sholette devotes himself to
describing the animation of a diverse, selection of contemporary artists
collectives and collective projects, American, European, South American,
and ?other?, for whom relationships as cultural workers to the neo-liberal
art world in recent decades of the 21st century, has been a central
concern. Among this history are crisp critical frameworks for understanding
the art and its positioning against what he calls ?enterprise culture? or
the current era of marked precarity in which artists are force to live,
which is also marked by ?enforced creativity? imposed on all forms of

Sholette, a New York-based artist, writer, and founding member of Political
Art Documentation/Distribution (PAD/D: 1980-1988), and REPOhistory
(1989-2000)[a collective I had some engagement with in 1989[ is as engaged
a political critic as he is an artist/activist. ?Dark Matter? is a
considerable art and activist history contributing an elegant read to what
is already in print, while paying homage to such luminaries as Lucy Lippard
and Martha Rosler, lurching forward afresh in its sharp critique of the
neo-liberalization of daily life, and celebrating collective action in the
?art world.? Much published history around activist art falls into two
distinct camps, books on specific ?identity politics? art from feminists,
gays, latino, ?etcetera? artists---David Roman?s ?Acts of Intervention:
Performance, Gay Culture, and AIDS?, for instance, ?Street Art San
Francisco-Missioin Muralismo*?*, by Annice Jacoby, for another; and
movement-oriented art books highlighting one ?outsider? art form
--graffiti, stencil art, Occupy art, for instance, which bracket a specific
local/global analysis, or art, comix, photography, music and poetry
?output? for a single movement. Then there are publications which
recuperate *material* archives: posters, papers, ?zines, and
self-made/artists?publications from collectives and groups, as political
art history. George Kaplan?s newly edited book, *Power to the People!* Is
one recent manifestation of this catalog type. Both publishing directions
offer significant breadth of understanding to radical culture and political
art. Understanding. What Sholette?s book has to offer as a companion to
these kinds of texts, is his politics, which looks at explicitally at
collectivized art in the ?enterprise culture??framing this within in
discourse on surplus labor and ?the invisible mass?--and privileging the
radical economy behind interventionist works as the basis of an era of art
making outside the mainstream. In other words, this book is about radical
art now; not recuperated art, and its about strains of art practice which
would elsewise go unnoticed, particularly in the broad, totality of culture
on which he writes.

On one level Dark Matter is a critique of the ?clipping out? of particular
activist art, for curatorial shows, an act that removes the work from its
labor, and reduces it to a mere ?institutional? appropriation. His account
of ?counter-institutional? interventions as political art production is by
contrast a finely tuned account. Sholette makes the sophisticated argument
that precarity, while not desired, is its own best motivator; that useless
labor, cast out and invisiblized as a byproduct of neoliberal capital,
develops its own economy from which to persist, linking methods in making
art as social production to itself as product of its own circumstances,
much as the aesthetics of Arte Povera, or feminist rejection of the art
history which presumed male-dominated creation, materials and
subjectivities of high art, have made visible the politics of art
processes, hierarchies, and so forth.

Sholette?s ideas are fresh, intelligent, particular, and funny. He asserts
what he earlier investigated in a the book, ?Radical Social Production and
the Missing Mass of the Contemporary Art World?(Pluto Press UK, 2009) in
which he examined the ?social production? of art and transitions from
?modernity? (which presupposed public spheres and ?masses?) to contemporary
culture. His objective there was to locate the mass, strategically and
politically and to name its purpose in the capitalist and artistic
imaginary. In ?Dark Matter?, he looks again at ?invisible? (or the missing)
contemporary artistic work amidst today?s neo-liberal appropriations
culture where the networked machine of neo-liberalism sucks up everything
up for its own use. This is a central and important visualization of the
current ground upon which politicized art stands, especially in light of
widespread NSA surveillance. As ?dark matter? in contrast to that upon
which light is shed, it has a certain material power. The ?missing mass?
imaginary of networked communications, creative industries, and immaterial
culture, is thus reassembled as a perceptible class of cultural workers and
this is fantastic, like James Bridle?s corollary imagery of virtual
subjects wandering in as yet unbuilt architecture in his explication of
?New Aesthetics?. Sholette points, in this assertion, to the manner by
which the white electronic computerized screen blinds us to the material;
and forces imaginaries upon us. This has not been stated so well by any
other writer.

?A Users Manual for the Creative Disruption of Everyday Life? (with Nato
Thompson for MassMoCA/MIT Press, 2004, 2006, 2008), as well as a special
issue of the journal Third Text co-edited with theorist Gene Ray on the
theme ?Whither Tactical Media? also with or by Sholette deal with some of
these ideas as well. ?Dark Matter? is a comprehensive guidebook to
collectivized, politicized art in contemporary times.




molly hankwitz, phd:::artist:::curator:::writer

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime {AT} kein.org