Re: <nettime> notes from the DIEM25 launch

[Stefan Heidenreich <mail@stefanheidenreich.de>]

despite I would share amost all of the general goals of DiEM25, there
are some remarkable procedural inconsistencies:

- intransparency: how can you criticize the compositon of EU-closed
meetings and apply the very same practice with a totally intransparent
selection process for the core discussion group?

- closed meetings: where are the vidoes of the internal discussions
held during the day? how can we demand the EU to open their meetings
if we don't do it ourselves?

- paywall: how can you charge 12€ entry fee, excluding the poor, the
refugees ..., and demand more equality at the same time?

Stefan


Am 13.02.2016 um 11:29 schrieb Felix Stalder:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I was also there at the Volksbühne (though not like Geert during the day).

<...>




#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: