rebe on Wed, 1 Feb 2017 04:43:19 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Protocols and Crises |
On 01.02.2017 02:16, Michael Gurstein wrote: > In fact, I believe that "protocol power" is the precise opposite of > multistakeholderism where MSism is always and necessarily ad hoc, temporary, > localized and where "showing up" (with the resources and staying power to > keep showing up) is the source of power in a MS environment. A "potential" openness for participation as a simulation based on the ability to participate which is uneven distributed. Further more blurring the lines of roles and responsibilities, fraternization of players. > "Protocol power" is fixed, static and generalized (globalized)--think the > rule of law rather than the outcome of a continuing series of ad hoc > negotiations among multiple disconnected stakeholders. Then I go for rule of law. However, the text explains: "Central to its practice is the notion of the protocol, that is, the rules of engagement of independent actors who do not bound in a hierarchical relationship of command and obedience to one another. Rather, a protocol generates a space of possible encounters by creating a set of highly-structured conditions under which interaction becomes possible in the first place." /A # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: