www.nettime.org
Nettime mailing list archives

Re: <nettime> Phillips/Beyer/Coleman: "false assumption (Mez Breeze & An
nettime's frog called digest on Sun, 23 Apr 2017 21:39:59 +0200 (CEST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: <nettime> Phillips/Beyer/Coleman: "false assumption (Mez Breeze & Andr�)


----- Forwarded message from Mez Breeze <netwurker {AT} gmail.com> -----

From: Mez Breeze <netwurker {AT} gmail.com>
Subject: Re: <nettime> Phillips/Beyer/Coleman: "false assumption that
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 05:30:25 +1000
To: nettime-l <nettime-l {AT} kein.org>

   "The search for sodalities is constant. Nuances are fudged. Contexts
   are ignored. Catharsis mutates through a checklist that reduces,
   confines, and truncates. We are force-fed trauma anecdotes as reality
   fulcrums. Baggage is exposed in painful lumps. We are not
   consideration-encouraged: we are expectation-drilled. We must agree.
   Must acquiesce. Must uncritically support. Anything else
   denunciation-equates..."
   [1]http://www.furtherfield.org/features/articles/mechanisms-of-exclusio
   n

   --
   | [7]mezbreezedesign.com

References

   1. http://www.furtherfield.org/features/articles/mechanisms-of-exclusion
   2. mailto:bhcontinentaldrift {AT} gmail.com
   3. https://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right
   4. http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
   5. http://www.nettime.org/
   6. mailto:nettime {AT} kein.org
   7. http://mezbreezedesign.com/

----- End forwarded message -----
----- Forwarded message from André <tabesin {AT} gmail.com> -----

From: Andr� <tabesin {AT} gmail.com>
Subject: Re: <nettime> Phillips/Beyer/Coleman: "false assumption that
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:19:01 +0200
To: nettime-l {AT} mail.kein.org

1) Do the creative participants in meme culture hold different political
views than 10 years ago? In what way does the American public hold
different views than 10 years ago?

2) Does meme culture, experimental and volatile as it is, guess or build
the future consensus?

3) Did we consider Clinton's frog reference smart analysis? Was it a
"WIN" or a "FAIL" to call them out?

4) Do - political views aside - attention-seeking "trolls" sympathize
with narcissist candidates?


--- Andr�


----- End forwarded message -----
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime {AT} kein.org
#   {AT} nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: