ozgur k. via nettime-l on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:10:37 +0200 (CEST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: <nettime> The Copy Far "AI" license


On September 23, 2023 6:48:59 PM GMT+03:00, rhatto via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org> wrote:
>Hello nettimers, this might be of interest:
>
>  Copy Far "AI" - A license close to copyleft, but far from the so-called
>  "Artificial Intelligences": https://copyfarai.itcouldbewor.se
>
>ps: I'm not in the list (please Cc).

"[...]cannot be used for procedures known as "machine learning" and stylometric analysist[...]" https://copyfarai.itcouldbewor.se/ ;

for proprietary ones, it could be a nice strategy/statement, but how about floss and even copyleft floss ones? what if the model is/will be released under a copyleft license? who would benefit more from limiting the use for training copyleft floss uses as well? 

i don't know if it is legally possible to enforce the output of copyleft ai tools to be copyleft as well. say, enforcing a program output from a copyleft ai system to be released as copyleft.

even if the copyleft method wouldn't be possible legally and technically for ai situations, isn't it a good.idea to support / encourage the development of floss models over proprietary ones through the statements as in this one?
--
özgür k.
gpg:A3E6 57AD E14D 1F66 A546 6101 BA42 0724 E750 C5AE
-- 
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org