Nmherman on Tue, 28 Sep 1999 02:02:20 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Re: RHIZOME_RAW: People Want to Know...If Artists Are Thinking |
In a message dated 9/26/99 6:44:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time, colink@gis.net writes: > talking about subverting the system when the system is the western art > world is more like playing an interesting game than a real, practical > strategy against a true threat. Maybe that's okay, art's all about playing > games, and games are ways of brainstorming strategies for the real world. > > Colin Colin, I disagree completely. The work is play for mortal stakes. Artists often comment on and influence political or socio-economic conditions. Stendhal and Gandhi are good examples. Western artists are safe from torture etc. Chinese artists are not. Why is this? Because the West is rich and powerful and does not fear its artists. They are entertainers and scholars without the ability to directly change policy or events, and most artists like it that way. China is vast, poor, and over-centralized, and any dissent is potentially lethal; individuals are dangerous and expendable. In other words, the western artist's freedom is an illusion. We have been marginalized and neutralized by the commodification of thought; we have been highly complicit in this sequestering. Or, to put it another way, is the American businessman complicit with and thus responsible for torture in Chiapas? Is Tom Brokaw? Is Trent Lott? You can say they are just living and making a living in their little slice of world, but the fact remains: whatever power you exert or have the potential to exert is in direct proportion to your complicity. If the western high-art world is stagnant, rotten, a playground for the rich tended by liverish servants, then it must be extremely guilty. Subverting it is everyone's duty, if you have the right kind of upbringing and an artistic bent. Just ask East Timorese machete babies. The internet is being shaped according to the interests of global capital. Artists have the power to dissent and stop this from succeeding; if we do not we have been complicit. This is the message of Tom's original post, as well as an interesting current thread about financial networks on nettime. Now is EXACTLY the time when subverting the artworld will have major consequences for world events. Max Herman The Genius 2000 Project www.geocities.com/~genius-2000 # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net