Introduction
Museology & net.art
ZKPVI - Nettime reader
     
    Mieke Gerritzen
    Lev Manovich
    Geert Lovink
    Michael van Eeden
    Lev Mnaovich
    m@
    Richard Barbrook
    Ted Byfield
    Tilman Baumgaertel
    Geert Lovink
    murph the surf
    beverlyt
    Pit Schultz
    RTMark Admin
    Sebastian Leutgert
    net.CALLBOY
    Luther Blisset
    Alexei Shulgin
    Scottart
    Dr. Future
    Felix Stalder
    James Stevens
    Francesca da Rimini
    Mathew Fuller
    Andrew Ross
    Simin Pope
    Anonimus
    Phil Graham
    G. Lovink & T. Druckrey
    Mathew Fuller
    Pit Schultz
    Felix Stalder
    Alan Sonheim
    David Cox
    text warez
    Slobodan MarkoviŠ
    Vinton G. Cerf
    Patrice Riemens
    nettime digestive system
    Reihold Grether
    Felix Stalder
   

Jesse Hirsh

    jodi
    Brian Carroll
    Brian Holmes
    CTHEORY Editor
    Brian Caroll
    Pit Schultz
    Brian Caroll
    McKenzie Wark
    Olia Lialina
    integer
    eyescratch
    www.vukcosic.org
    kuni
 
 

2001.03.06. - kuni, Re: Venice, an option

Subject: Re: Venice, an option
From: kuni
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 21:21:21 +0100

dear vuk,

> In order to shed some quality light on net.art, I have decided to curate a > paralel show where I have invited some people you all might know. The desire > is to contextualize my shit.

brilliant idea.

esp. as any avantgarde later to be known as such needs more but one lonely soldier ;-)

[and for those naive beings who'd assumed at this point the net as such would have been enough context to contextualize net.art: wake up. here we are talking about a traditional art world biennial thing]

well, anyway:
> the catalogue of the other show (alexei, rtmark, heath,
> 01010101..., jodi, tom jennings, vinylvideo, vuk)

just in case this is already the list of participants you invited for the other show, it seems to me that the significant other is significantly underrepresented. I mean: 50% of 0100101110101101.org is really poor, isn't it?

is this part of some extra sophisticated ironic strategy - like: 'they' want to represent the absolute net.artist, I will show 'them' that absolute net.art is _really_ matching all the needs for a new avant-garde... ...because avantgarde was, is and will always be "men only"... ...because in times that see more and more people so eager not only to make, but also to write truenet.art.history one should not hesitate to meet the needs of traditional art history, that is, a.o., to give people later on the opportunity to ask: "why have there been no great women net.artists?"
...or just
...because net.art, I mean: real net.art and esp. true net.art (that is: the context you named above) definitely was (and is) more or less "men only"?

or do you just want to make some pun on/fun of the good old nettimers, themselves so often (and sooo unwarranted indeed) blamed for being an old boys' club?

in any of the above named cases:
brilliant!

immensely amused:
kuni
ps:
neither artist, nor net.artist, nor feeling
excluded by any criteria for net.art.avantgarde ;-))
- just: immensely amused, though...
anyway, just in case you need some inspiration as
net.art.curator, just mailto:boys@obn.org
you know, for sure we can help you out with some names
& urls...