Mark Robbins on Tue, 22 Feb 2000 01:30:07 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: <nettime> IMF Chief & Sheep Cloner Flanned in Thailand & UK


"I think I see shrimp."

"That's cheese."

"Could it be sesame seeds."

"I think it's cheese. Excuse me, miss, is that cheese?"

Three activists are buying lunch in a cafe across from San Francisco's Hall
of Justice, where they have just been assigned a judge for trial. They press
their faces against the glass display case and interrogate the mildly
befuddled girl behind the counter about the specific dairy and animal
content of each item. Not quite getting the point, she offers to add cheese
to something.

It's not easy being an activist these days.

"We can hold rallies 'til we turn blue in the proverbial face, and the media
doesn't care," says one of the three, Justin Gross, 27. Tall and
ruddy-faced, Gross is, for the most part, pleasantly spacey about his
activist motivations. ("Everything deserves respect. Everything is alive,"
he says, beaming.) But at this moment, he feels frustrated and slips into
sarcasm: "Oh, another rally in San Francisco."

Gerard Livernois, 34, leans in over his fruit salad, his goatee thrust
forward. "Even extreme banner-hanging doesn't get much media attention these
days," he says.

"You know several times a month, there's going to be a march," says Rahula
Janowski.

"Several times a week," interrupts Gross.

Janowski, 27, is a scruffy, slender blonde whose thrift-store clothes ("I'm
not going to buy something new," she says) and straightforward intensity
suggest Michelle Pfeiffer by way of Burlington, Vermont. "To catch people's
attention, it's got to be something bigger and different," she says. "Which
is," she continues, "the curse and the blessing of pie."

Janowski, Gross, and Livernois are just a small part of a larger group (a
"movement," they claim) called the Biotic Baking Brigade (BBB). They are
activists in a variety of causes, including the campaign to free Mumia
Abu-Jamal (see "Innocence by Association"), animal rights, and the
hunger-relief group Food Not Bombs, and among them the three have been to
hundreds of protests -- but nothing they've ever done has brought them as
much attention as throwing pies. Pies solved what had been an insolvable
problem, and each of them understood this from the moment the group heard
about pie-throwing as a tactic.

Says Janowski: "I think the pieings proved you don't have to march around in
circles all the time."

She admits it almost doesn't seem fair. "Having been involved in radical
activism for a long time, being involved in organizing events that are
geared to get attention, like doing housing takeovers and things like that,
which almost never get any press...and here's this thing that didn't take
any organizing or long-term planning or anything like that," she says,
shaking her head. "The irony still kind of strikes me: how [many] good,
dedicated, organized things happen that get ignored, [things] that are the
sum of a lot of really dedicated work, and then this...gets so much press.

"I think people are going to take up pies when they read this," she says.

In November, Janowski, Gross, and Livernois became known as the Cherry Pie
Three for their pieing of San Francisco mayor Willie Brown. In the scuffle
that ensued, one of Brown's entourage wrestled Janowski to the ground with
enough force to break her collarbone; all three were arrested and charged
with misdemeanor battery and assault on a public official. In January, they
were found guilty on the battery charge, but innocent of assault. The
initial incident made national news -- including the front page of the New
York Times.

Targeting the "upper crust" -- those they believe to be otherwise
"unaccountable" for a variety of corporate crimes -- the BBB has tossed pies
in the faces (or general direction) of 11 individuals besides Brown,
including the economist and Nobel laureate Milton Friedman, Monsanto CEO
Robert Shapiro, Novartis Corporation CEO Douglas Watson, San Francisco city
supervisor Gavin Newsom, Maxxam CEO Charles Hurwitz, and Sierra Club
executive director Carl Pope. In addition, the BBB claims affiliation with a
"worldwide pastry uprising" that includes the pieing of World Trade
Organization director general Renato Ruggiero.

If nothing else, the trial of the Cherry Pie Three and Janowski's collarbone
give the actions of the BBB an edge of seriousness that one might not
normally associate with tactics of such vaudevillian origins. The BBB's
press releases and other calls to action mention both her injury and the
charges brought against the group as examples of how, "yet again, justice
has clearly not been served, which is why the BBB dishes up delicious
mischief in the first place."

During their trial, the lawyers for the Cherry Pie Three argued that
pie-throwing is an act of political protest. More than once, defense
attorney Katya Komisaruk remarked that "throwing a pie is like burning the
flag."

Actually, says the Sierra Club's Carl Pope, "it's like being slugged. The
pie has nothing to do with it -- it's the fist behind the pie."

The BBB traces its roots back to the yippies and to the "Great American
Pieman," '70s activist Aron Kay, as well as to the more recent pastry antics
of Nol Godin, the mastermind behind the February 1998 pieing of Microsoft
CEO Bill Gates in Belgium and the earlier "entartments" of filmmaker
Jean-Luc Godard and novelist Marguerite Duras. A major difference between
those antecedents and the BBB's activities is the way the BBB connects
pieing to a whole framework of beliefs and causes.

Al Decker threw the BBB's first pie in August 1997. Now a de facto spokesman
for the BBB, Decker, 27, ends press conferences and phone calls with such
salutations as, "It's a good day to pie" and the more casual, "Pie-pie." An
environmental activist for more than six years, he was working in Humboldt
County when he heard that Charles Hurwitz, the CEO of Maxxam (the parent
company of Pacific Lumber, a logging firm in the Northern California county)
was in the area.

"I had heard about yippies throwing pies at political figures," says Decker,
"though I couldn't tell you who or what." He also knew that Earth First! had
attempted to pie a Washington state official in 1988.

"I heard Hurwitz was in town and the first thing that came into my head was,
'Hurwitz is going to get pied,'" he says.

Decker advocates throwing pies because, he explains, "it's a visual
Esperanto...a universal expression of criticism and disdain." And, he says,
"you'll see activists laugh more about this than you will just about any
other form of activism." I ask if that's really saying very much. Decker
replies: "This may be the best we can do."

They're not even real pies. Using organic ingredients, including tofu and
various nondairy substitutes, the BBB for the most part tosses pies bereft
of milk or eggs. This makes for pies that tend to soften quickly, becoming
drippy and perhaps less theatrical than one would expect. "The vegan ones
don't hold together so well," says Decker. "There have been emergencies when
we've needed a pie immediately. In that case, we've usually gone to local
stores. You know, we want to support community stores whenever possible."

After the Brown incident, the BBB said that they will no longer use cherry
or any other red filling that could possibly be mistaken for blood.

At one BBB rally, four vegan desserts are served: a fruit cobbler, two tofu
crme pies, and a faux lemon tart. The cobbler is delicious. The lemon tart,
with a translucent, gelatinous filling that looks like cloudy Jell-O, goes
untouched for some time.

In terms of sheer coverage, the Brown event is without a doubt the BBB's
most successful exploit. "It was one of the lead stories on NPR," says the
brigade's minister of communications, Mark Liiv. "We got international
coverage," he continues, pressing into my palm a faxed clipping from the
Turkish Daily News. Because it is typical of the coverage received -- and
because it's only two sentences long -- it is worth citing in full:

San Francisco mayor Willie Brown was nailed in the face with an assortment
of desserts by pie-throwing demonstrators. It was the fifth attack in four
weeks by the Biotic Baking Brigade, whose members pitch baked goods to draw
attention to a series of environmental and social causes.

Of the nearly 40 news stories that covered the trio's pieing of Brown, only
about one quarter mentioned exactly why the Cherry Pie Three did it: to draw
attention to a series of city policies that the BBB calls "homeless programs
for business owners" instead of homeless programs for the homeless.

"My problem with it has been that the media tends to focus on the
sensationalism of the event...rather than address the issues that we were
addressing," Janowski says. "I mean, there have been articles that say,
'[It] had something to do with the homeless,' when we've been really
specific with our press releases about what it has to do with the homeless."

But the BBB's press releases call for no specific legislative change, and
without such an agenda, it's not surprising that the strategy produced few
tangible results. What it did create was a counterattack by Brown's
supporters, who, incredibly, claimed that by pieing Brown (an African
American) the group exhibited racist behavior. Confronted with attacks on
its own politics, the BBB quickly apologized to Brown supporters for how the
act could have been perceived, and met with some of them to, as Komisaruk
puts it, "try to get some healing out of this."

The Brown episode is not the BBB's only misstep. Says Pope: "They pied me
because they believed I had not opposed the Quincy Library bill," a
legislative attempt environmentalists claim will increase logging in
California's northeastern forests. But, he says, the Sierra Club did fight
it: "[That is] a bill both the Sierra Club and I spent an enormous amount of
time and energy opposing." Pope's annoyance with the misplaced anger of the
BBB is only exacerbated by what he sees as the short attention span of the
media. "The press covering this is not saying, Do these people know anything
about the issues they're talking about? They're saying, These pie people
threw a pie."

Pope points out that if the BBB's pie-throwing is really a response to the
media's refusal to cover more sedate forms of protest, then it has chosen
the wrong targets. "If they really want to make that point, then they should
pie your editors," he says. "If that's the problem -- the media -- then why
are they pieing either Monsanto or Carl Pope?"

Still, the combination of misinformation and shallow journalism makes for
protest that is, Pope says, "utterly ineffective, if the payoff is 'I got in
the newspaper.'"

But clearly, if journalists have mishandled the BBB's political message,
they've had a certain degree of help from the pie throwers themselves.

According to a BBB press release, Shapiro, the CEO of Monsanto, got his
because of his company's "aggressive global takeover of seed, chemical, and
pharmaceutical companies, with an aim to control world food distribution."
The language is a bit inflammatory, but the BBB's basic point is grounded in
fact.

Watson, the CEO of Novartis, and Gordon Rausser, the dean of the college of
natural resources at the University of California at Berkeley, were pied to
express the BBB's contempt for the university's partnership with the biotech
firm. While the activists didn't go to great lengths to explain why such a
relationship could be bad, they did succeed in bringing attention to the
issue.

The reasoning behind the group's choice of other targets is less precise. A
recent press release heralds a future operation "code-named 'Pie2K,'" which,
says the BBB, "will target computer industry executive[s] and consultants."
Arguing that "the people have judged them guilty of gross (disgusting,
really) negligence over the course of several decades," the press release
calls the Y2K bug "one of the most striking examples of the inherent flaws
in capitalism [that]...reveal the inherent vulnerability of technology
itself, as well as the hubris and shortsightedness of the technocrats who
have computerized everything they possibly could in the short time computers
have been in existence. The proper response, truly, is a shower of pies
across the nighttime sky upon Silicon Valley."

A letter of support the BBB disseminated managed to bring in references to
the new San Francisco Giants stadium currently being built, Mumia Abu-Jamal,
the "mysterious" death of a San Francisco poll worker, and the international
labor movement. Then there's Decker's statement on the BBB's targeting of
Milton Friedman, a free market economist whose ideas were a chief influence
behind the economic policies of Chile's former Pinochet regime. "We hold
Milton Friedman responsible for crimes against the people," Decker said in a
press release. Friedman, charged Decker, supports "globalization and 'free
trade' policies which have brought the world poverty, misery, starvation,
and ecological devastation." At the end of his statement, Decker goes so far
as to link Friedman to the recent death of an Earth First! activist who was
killed by a falling tree while protesting Maxxam's timber operations in the
Headwaters Forest.

At times it seems as though the BBB members' own best intentions work
against their chances of being understood. During the trial of the Cherry
Pie Three, a reporter from CNN asks Gross, "Would [it] be fair to describe
you as homeless advocates?" But Gross equivocates.

"I'm involved in a variety of things," he says. "We're all really involved
in a variety of things."

The CNN reporter -- happy to repeat on international television whatever
specific cause the activist chooses to name -- presses on: "But what do you
spend most of your time doing?"

Gross grins: "A lot of things."

At our lunch near the courthouse, the Cherry Pie Three and Komisaruk grapple
with the paradox of their media coverage.

Komisaruk is practical. "Novelty is critical.... Pieing is currently the
tactic of the moment. In order to flourish, we'll have to come up with
something else," she says. "[The] media doesn't cover the same old, same
old. Unless you can bring out a huge number of people to your demonstration,
you're not going to get anything.

"The purpose of these strategies," she adds, "is to get people's attention,
which means getting the media's attention."

Janowski peels the mozzarella off her sandwich. "The passage of history has
sped up," she says. Sped up so fast, she says, that it's hard to figure out
an appropriate response to these times of rapid technological evolution. "To
use the term 'revolution' is a slap in the face. We are philosophically cast
adrift; we don't have ways to put what's going on into context."

What is going on, exactly?

"Once you start looking at where things come from...." Janowski searches for
an example. "Like, being vegan I'm not going to eat this cheese, because the
process that creates this cheese, I feel, is unhealthy. But once you start
tracking things back to the source....

"Like, I'm a lot more offended to see someone wearing gold than I am to see
someone eating cheese, because the process of gold extraction is bad for the
environment, it's bad for the animals [in that environment], it's bad for
the people -- [and] it's usually native people. Once you look at things that
way, you're done for. You just can't be a willing participant in consumer
society anymore."

What does it feel like to walk around in a world where there is so much
meaning attached to everything?

"You get pretty angry," she says quietly. "Some of my friends are angry all
the time." Adds Livernois, "I really only hang out with other animal rights
activists and ACT UP people."

Gross looks out the window. "Just to be alive," he says, "you're complicit
in -- for lack of a better term -- crimes."

The optimism of Daniel McGowan, 24, flags just momentarily during the time
that we talk. One of the two BBB members who pied Watson, he speaks of the
effect it had, deeming that operation a success. "Prior to pieing, the only
coverage I saw talked about 'the glorious alliance' between the company and
the university," he says. "After, there was a lot of critical coverage." But
when I ask to see some of that coverage, he rummages through the stack of
papers stuffed into his Garfield folder and comes up empty. He shrugs.
"Maybe I spoke too soon."

--End of Mother Jones Article--





#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net