Re: <nettime> rage against the machine

[John Young <jya@pipeline.com>]

Safety in the real world is like privacy online, far less effective 
then adveritized. Machines, like buildings and infrastructure, come 
with inherent hazards: Deaths and injuries are acceptable costs of 
"convenience," "benefits," "jobs," "progress."

Finance and insurance are like autocratic national security, 
secretive, vampiric and bloodthirsty, thriving on misfortune of the 
unlucky who are targeted by global marketing enterprises and 
profitability (branding, influencing, celebritization. 
FirstLook.media a shining example, gander its preening slather 
underwritten by RU-grade empathy and oligarchy

Professionals, all of them, are predators state-licensed to provide 
assurance the public interest is protected, though casualties are to 
be expected, normalized, in law, medicine, education, construction, 
incarceration, journalism - racketeer-influenced organizations - 
above all in government legislation and regulation subject to 
predatory practices camouflaged by elections and FOI pretense.

.

At 03:48 PM 3/17/2019, you wrote:
> This is deeply ideological and political issue, not technical one. 
> Inserting code written by middlemen between humans and reality 
> empowers only the middlemen. Humans are presented by fantasy that 
> adheres to reality when and in degree being decided by the middlemen.
>
> There is one small step between this and removing all agency from 
> humans (if not already done). It's like company wants to sack 
> someone, first they make sure that the sackee's job is irrelevant 
> (someone else controls and does it) and the sackee cannot do damage.
>
> Well, you are being sacked.
>
> Note that autonomous vehicles are becoming affordable assassination 
> instruments. It would cost a fortune a decade ago to create robotic 
> suicide vehicle bomber, so humans were used. Today anyone with basic 
> skills can buy one of these and hack the controls. It's 100% 
> software job. Add some ML and the vehicle can pick victims on its 
> own ("dark skinned males" or "carrying yoga mat" or "MAGA hat", etc.)
>
>
> > " But Boeing isn't planning to overhaul its training procedures. And
> > neither the F.A.A., nor the European Union Aviation Safety Agency
> > <https://www.easa.europa.eu/>, are proposing additional simulator
> > training for pilots, according to a person familiar with the
> > deliberations. Instead, the regulators and Boeing agree that the best
> > way to inform pilots about the new software is through additional
> > computer-based training, which can be done on their personal computers."
>
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:


#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: