Arthur Bueno on Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:46:50 +0200


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Syndicate: Fw: Communique-Fred_Fores


> Thu, 29 Jun 2000  04:26:39  +0200
> Subject: Communique-Fred_Forest
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> COMMUNIQUE FRENCH + ENGLISH
> Priorite a internet
> Version integrale et gratuite sur internet, pour une exploitation
non-commerciale des réception de ce mail : http://www.fredforest.org/proces
> Tous à vos ordinateurs pour telecharger ! Sur table, chez tous les
libraires de France et de Navarre à partir du 1er septembre 2000 à l'aube
pour l'édition/ papier, L'Harmattan, Paris.
> "Art Contemporain : fonctionnement et dysfonctionnements"
> "UN PROCES POUR L'EXEMPLE"
> Un livre de Fred Forest
> Une preface Pierre Restany
>
> Proces peu commun et revelateur engage par un artiste contre le Centre
Georges Pompidou jusqu en Conseil d'Etat pour son manque de transparence,
pave dans la mare de l'art contemporain et ses institutions, ce livre sous
forme d'un appel "solennel" aux responsables politiques prend de vitesse les
mesures que Catherine Tasca s'apprete à prendre dans le domaine des arts
plastiques où souffle un vent de fronde et de contestation. En sa double
qualité de ministre de la Culture et de représentante du parti
> socialiste : Catherine Tasca ne pourra pas ne pas en tenir compte !
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ---- - Service de presse : Sonia Dufresne Tel : 01 40 46 79 22 Fax : 01 43
25 82 03
>
>
>
ENGLISH_____________________________________________________________________
____
> ME VS. BEAUBOURG ! htttp://www.fredforest.org/proces
> By sueing the Centre National d'Art et de Culture Georges Pompidou, the
French artist Fred Forest wanted a trial for an example. To have been
dismissed by the Conseil d'Etat doesn't matter, as the aim was to denounce
the lack of clearness of both Beaubourg and the Institutions as far as
trading of Modern Art is concerned, to denounce them for not following the
contents of the 1978 law about clearness of public accounts. By refusing to
give these informations, they are causing the problem of the opacity of the
public power, and they are leading to fall apart, and they deprive citizens
of their legitimate right of controlling the use of their money, that is the
public money. It is a
> trial for the citizens, with symbolic signifiance, as the involved artist
is not defending his own interest.
>
____________________________________________________________________________
_
> Such a situation is not honourable for us, with regards to our foreign
neighbours. That's the reason why I, as both an artist and a citizen,
solemnly appeal to the socialist minister who is currently on duty for
deciding arrangements as soon as possible to make up for that serious attack
on Democracy.
>
____________________________________________________________________________
_
> This work, the complete issue of which you may fully examine for free on
this site, tells the assault course, the judicial events and the critical
point of view that the artist is exposing with invigorating eloquence and
humour about the official circles of the contemporary art.
>

------Syndicate mailinglist--------------------
 Syndicate network for media culture and media art
 information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate
 to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at>
 in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress