Syndicate: Re: selection videonale 9, Bonn/D

[integer@www.god-emil.dk]

hallo

is there 01 particular reason why his [S<F6>ren Grammel's] response
is being posted again +?

it is inaccurate as i have indicated in my subsequent posts.
videonale did not peruse all entries.

nn



>To: syndicate@aec.at
>Subject: Syndicate: Re: selection videonale 9, Bonn/D
>Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:45:56 +0100 (CET)
>From: Syndicate admin <syndicate@v2.nl>
>
>From: "VIDEONALE9" <VIDEONALE9@gmx.de>
>To: <integer@www.god-emil.dk>, <info@videonale.org>, <syndicate@aec.at>
>Subject: Re: selection videonale 9, Bonn/D
>Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:33:40 +0100
>
>
>dear Netochka Nezvanova    
>
>> it is certainly bizarre that they mention tapes now when
>> they did _not mention tapes in the submission guidelines.
>> - please update the protocol to match
>
>1. we talked about works first : but most of them were tapes : so, its not 
>"bizarre" - its just unprecise I suggest : sorry for the unpreciseness
>
>2. nevertheless we looked at all 14 urls : you did not send any entry+entryform:
> 
>maybe you just sent your url adress to our email-account, but then you missed 
>the entry-guidelines : next time have a look at them first
>
>3. when you write an email to me, say "you", but not "they": I refuse this 
>rhetoric of suspicion
>
>S<F6>ren Grammel
>curator




------Syndicate mailinglist--------------------
 Syndicate network for media culture and media art
 information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate
 to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at>
 in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress