[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> Khalfa: violent strategies

[integer@www.god-emil.dk]

>guerrilla criticism
>
>little wars, micro-conflict
>
>> >From the outset, the workers' movement was divided as to the kind of
>> response it should give. Two main approaches appeared. ...Neither of these approaches
>> has worked.
>
>agreed
>
>> In addition, theorising violence, or even acclaiming it, has day-to-day
>> consequences on people's behaviour and on the culture developed in the
>> organisations that use it.
>
>wherefore the need to theorise? the violence in us is deep-seated and
>immovable.

uant 2 tr! +?
re:move dzoze ....




>the most important things to communicate are not *solidarity* and
>*radicalism*, but the urgency and relevance of change to the lives of
>all.

re:move dzoze ....

urgency and relevance of change








nn - so that everyone may have pleasant feelings about nature








    /_/
                          /
             \            \/       i should like to be a human plant
            \/       __
                    __/
                                   i will shed leaves in the shade
        \_\                        because i like stepping on bugs



*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
Netochka Nezvanova                   nezvanova@eusocial.com
                                    http://www.eusocial.com
                                  http://www.biohakc.com
                                http://www.ggttctttat.com/!
ztranger than fiktion         http://steim.nl/leaves/petalz
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-- --*--*--*--*--*--*--




_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold