Jan Straathof via nettime-l on Fri, 22 Dec 2023 20:36:59 +0100 (CET)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> the silence on the rising fascism
|
- To: Christian Swertz via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- Subject: Re: <nettime> the silence on the rising fascism
- From: Jan Straathof via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 20:36:31 +0100
- Cc: Jan Straathof <janstr@wirehub.nl>
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 lists.servus.at 201C4101432F
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.nettime.org; s=default; t=1703273814; bh=r8CTmMn4Gb5AmDR60ck9DQcloW6wTw2vHIdC/1JWreU=; h=Date:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=JJ0L/7L4At6DLsFM1pSnqgULvOR1ASAI2S8hTshgjaDTMTZCGTwtVEb0iclJr9Gf4 MLqJjTaETrGUUONoHpebcoWZPT9XTpWuF4dxWbkkOAaap40kgkL14DLZXNPLo+RQAj 1PJQjjvoX/Yamzusb/X+8mgVIkmCFoGLM6q41x6k=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wirehub.nl; s=wirehub01; h=from:to:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:content-type; bh=hH9oSeRvR2bt2JixBM7pKYR7apOcHcZG+T0zOdjUgSI=; b=j+FxMrIcQw/dkVDkheDatwdZW9w15fNrSrbXmg5o0XmLtFUER+t8BgVD+FeUyVum6hoyzodt9BbIe qO2HPhwpIn44B/g6+PzxHgz0BduModPFR1f3VpJEDeh7cfztDohiuWthLdRZWJCzTJEoDYyQIxzgiC 8IrHyMju/hU/tgSM=
- In-reply-to: <98e110a1-9fca-4a8f-bdf8-fc68be1d14d7@swertz.org>
- References: <eec541f04417f045e378859565e71960@publiclife.org> <AF42A279-B92D-4F9F-91CE-09C869D7272E@gmail.com> <98e110a1-9fca-4a8f-bdf8-fc68be1d14d7@swertz.org>
- Reply-to: "<nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets" <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Op 22-12-2023 om 12:03 schreef Christian Swertz via nettime-l:
Hello,
Am 21.12.23 um 20:03 schrieb Ted Byfield via nettime-l:
So, again: when someone laments the "silence on" some subject, one
way to understand that gesture — just one way, not the only ways — is
that it assumes a traditional, even nostalgic model of discourse,
and on that basis diagnoses a collective failure.
Silence is defined as a traditional model of discourse? I have to
admit that this seems not intuitive to me. I tried to translate it to
German - but the result does not make sense in relation to the
definition. Maybe you can help me with a hint on the other ways to
define "silence"?
As Heidegger once wrote: "/Die Sprache spricht als das Geläut der
Stille.//" /[UzS: 30]
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org