balie-wonderland-admin on Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:12:57 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-nl] [Mediaprogrammering] PreWar - Richard Grusin in de Balie - woensdag12 november |
Geacht Balie-publiek, Komende week organiseert de Govcom.org Foundation, ism De Balie, een internationale media workshop in De Balie getiteld "The News about Networks". De workshop onderzoekt de relatie tussen nieuwsproductie en media netwerken. In het kader van de workshop worden twee publieke activiteiten georganiseerd:- op woensdagavond 12 november een publiek debat met Richard Grusin, - en op vrijdagavond 14 november een afsluitende presentatie met als titel "Doing without News". Beide avondprogramma's beginnen om 20.00 uur. Meer details treft u hieronder aan en in het media katern van de nieuwe balie website. vriendelijke groet, Richard Rogers http://www.govcom.org Eric Kluitenberg http://www.debalie.nl _______________________ PreWar: Media Logics in the run-up to the Iraq War Richard Grusin, Wayne State University, Detroit Wednesday, 12 November 2003 20.00 hrs. De Balie - Salon, Amsterdam http://www.debalie.nl/artikel.jsp?articleid=4478&podiumid=media Why did the Iraq War seem inevitable? Richard Grusin addresses the question in a presentation at de Balie, followed by a debate. Introduction by Richard Rogers, Media Studies, University of Amsterdam Debate led by Noortje Marres, Philosophy, University of Amsterdam Richard Grusin: In the presentation I elaborate what I see the threefold character of premediation at work at the beginning of the twenty-first century. First, where remediation entailed the refashioning of prior media forms, I claim that premediation entails the desire to remediate future media forms and technologies. In addition, I argue that premediation entails the desire to remediate the future before it happens, the desire that the future be always already pre-mediated. Finally, I suggest that this desire to premediate the future before it happens is accompanied by the desire to insure that the future is so fully mediated by new media forms and technologies that it is unable to emerge into the present without having already been remediated in the past. The concept of premediation helps to explain the sense of inevitability that preceded the U.S. invasion of Iraq March 2003. Premediation functions in some important sense as the medial logic of the Bush administration's doctrine of pre-emptive warfare. In a political regime of preemptive war, premediation is the dominant media regime-by premediating the war, remediating it before it happens, the formal structure of U.S. news media effectively supported U.S. military doctrine, participating in the preemptive remediation of a future (premediated) war. That is, the Bush doctrine of preemptive war required a preemptive media plan, a premediation of the inevitable future (or of any number of possible inevitable futures, as long as they all led to war with Iraq). This doctrine of preemption, as opposed to the prior doctrine of deterrence, has been circulating in neo-con circles at least since 1989; similarly premediation has been emerging over the course of the 1990s, often as remediation's unseen double. Where prior to 1989 we see a U.S. media regime oriented primarily towards the past, particularly to the Cold War aftermath of WW II, the doctrine of preemptive war, as opposed to the more "remedial" doctrine of deterrence, looks to refashion not the past but the future. Beginning with the 2002 State of the Union Address, the Bush administration repeatedly played out the war against Iraq in print and televisual news media. Cynically such premediations functioned to help insure that the American public would return control of the Congress to Bush's Republican party in the 2002 mid-term elections. Equally cynically, however, this premediation of the war against Iraq allowed the networked media to increase their ratings in the run-up to war, as well as to engage in a kind of audience testing on how best to cover the war when it did occur. These cynical readings of media and political self-interest should not be underemphasized. But they do not in and of themselves explain away the logic of premediation; rather they underscore the attraction of premediation to an American public whose sense of invincibility or invulnerabilty remains shaken by the events of 9/11. Biographical sketch Richard Grusin is Professor and Chair in the Department of English at Wayne State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley in 1983. He is the author of three books. The first, Transcendentalist Hermeneutics: Institutional Authority and the Higher Criticism of the Bible (Duke, 1991), concerns the influence of European (primarily German) theories of biblical interpretation on the interpretive theories of New England Transcendentalists like Emerson, Thoreau, and Theodore Parker. His more recent work concerns historical, cultural, and aesthetic aspects of technologies of visual representation. With Jay David Bolter he is the author of Remediation: Understanding New Media (MIT, 1999), which sketches out a genealogy of new media, beginning with the contradictory visual logics underlying contemporary digital media. Grusin's latest book, Culture, Technology, and the Creation of America's National Parks (Cambridge, 2003), focuses on the problematics of visual representation involved in the founding of America's national parks. Currently he is working on the social, political, and aesthetic relationships among film and new digital media. -------------------------- Tickets & Reservations: Ticket price: Euro 7,50, with reduction: Euro 5,00 Opening hours ticket office:On weekdays 13.00-18.00 hrs or till the start of a program. In the weekend 1,5 hour before the program starts. Reserve by phone: 020 55 35 100, during opening hours until 45 minutes before the program starts. debalie / Kleine-Gartmanplantsoen 10 / 1017 RR / Amsterdamhttp://www.debalie.nl _____________________ Doing without News Workshop presentationFriday November 14, 2003 20.00 hrs. De Balie - Salon, Amsterdam News may be thought of as a media space that devours - a ghetto-land of personalities and story templates that require constant attention to the smiles, styles and cycles of its production. The evening is devoted to a series of questions about whether we can do without news. Is it still necessary to be appear in the news? Is newsworthiness and news attention still a sign of value? Do we need news to be known? More to the point, do Internet-based networks challenge our perceived need for press attention? 20 media activists and advocates have spent one week testing the conditions of news marginalisation. They also have looked into tactics that may lessen the importance of press appearance. They present their findings as well as their strategies for being known without appearing in the news. The evening is the culmination of the week-long workshop, The News about Networks, co-produced by de Balie and the Govcom.org Foundation, Amsterdam, with a grant from the Ford Foundation, New York. On Friday admission is free, but please reserve a ticket or obtain it at the Balie ticket office because of limited seating. Both events are part of the News about Networks workshop, co-produced by de Balie and the Govcom.org Foundation, Amsterdam, http://www.issuenetwork.org, with support from the Ford Foundation, New York. -------------------------- Opening hours ticket office:On weekdays 13.00-18.00 hrs or till the start of a program. In the weekend 1,5 hour before the program starts. Reserve by phone: 020 55 35 100, during opening hours until 45 minutes before the program starts. debalie / Kleine-Gartmanplantsoen 10 / 1017 RR / Amsterdam http://www.debalie.nl
______________________________________________________ * Verspreid via nettime-nl. Commercieel gebruik niet * toegestaan zonder toestemming. <nettime-nl> is een * open en ongemodereerde mailinglist over net-kritiek. * Meer info, archief & anderstalige edities: * http://www.nettime.org/. * Contact: Menno Grootveld (grootveld@nrc.nl).