douwe on Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:26:30 +0200 (CEST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

<nettime> FW: [Reader-list] the 404 error story

As a little side information for the Google's Weapons of Mass Destruction. I
picked it up from the mailinglist.

Douwe Osinga

-----Original Message-----
[]On Behalf Of Ravi Sundaram
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:00 PM
Subject: [Reader-list] the 404 error story

The war on the web
Anthony Cox describes how his spoof error page turned into a 'Google bomb'
for weapons of mass destruction
Anthony Cox
Wednesday July 09 2003
The Guardian

I had always wondered how those viral emails or amusing web page addresses
forwarded to me built up such momentum. Little did I know that I would be
responsible for one of the most successful internet memes this year, and
be accused of developing a so-called "Google bomb" of mass destruction.

In early February, I was reading online a Guardian article about Hans
Blix's problems obtaining cooperation in Iraq. Immediately after, I was
confronted with the ubiquitous 404 error page, which usually tells the
reader that a website is unavailable. With this serendipitous inspiration
in mind, along with a text editor and some fiddling in a graphics package,
I created a spoof 404 "weapons of mass destruction" error page. Saddam
would have been proud; the page was deployed and operational well within
45 minutes.

After favourable comments from friends, I posted it in the newsgroup
uk.rec.humour. Within the next 24 hours, the website had had 150,000 hits
and had propagated to 118 newsgroups. By the end of February, it had
received more than one million page impressions. Perhaps the ultimate
accolade was having the original email come back to me with a note saying:
"Have you seen this?" Visits declined throughout the subsequent war, and I
suspected its 15MB of fame had passed.

Yet, suddenly, in the first four days of July I received nearly 4m page
impressions, more than the previous five months combined. The reason?
Typing "weapons of mass destruction" in Google and hitting the "I'm
feeling lucky" button did not bring up Number 10's "dodgy dossier", but my
spoof site. Suddenly, it was a lot funnier and accessible: even Google
couldn't find the WMD.

The first Google bomb was created by Adam Mathes in 2001. He exploited
Google's page ranking system to return a friend's website when the words
"talentless hack" were used as a search term. He used a multitude of pages
linking to his friend's site, with the specific term "talentless hack".
Even though his friend's site did not contain the search term itself,
after calling upon others to insert such links into their sites, the
Google bomb found its target.

Google's page ranking treats links as votes for a website, and both the
number and the importance of the link helps increase the ranking of a
site. My site had steadily increased its ranking, including a link from
the Channel 4 news website and the Guardian, but perhaps the majority were
from personal pages, discussion boards and blogs.

However, this was not a deliberate attempt to use Google to make a
political point. This Google bomb was slowly and unknowingly built, and
only by chance coincided with the accusations that intelligence documents
had been "sexed up".

Last Friday, bloggers really picked up on it and it was the highest linked
to page in weblogs according to On Monday, however, a search
for "weapons of mass destruction" sent you to a White House strategy
document, which might be seen as a step forward for Google users and
perhaps the White House. Then on Tuesday my page was back at the top, so
it may have been a glitch at Google, rather than a deliberate decision to
drop the site.

This is a problem for Google: weblogs have been accused of causing "noise"
in their searches. Instead of providing good original source material,
reams of musings from bloggers are returned. The success of my WMD page
underlines a problem Google needs to address. Sure it's funny, but if you
wanted documents on WMD, is that what you really expect from a search

I have received about 200 emails from such diverse sources as United
Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission and serving
soldiers in the Gulf. Even those critical of the perceived anti-war
message thought it was funny. One of the more offensive messages called me
a cowardly little boy and stated: "I am grateful to the almighty that not
all Englishmen are slithering bottom-feeders."

Ironically, I was not against the war, my views on the war being similar
to those of journalist David Aaronovitch and MP Ann Clwyd. But if you are
going to make a topical joke, then Bush is an obvious and easy target.
&#183; Anthony Cox is a pharmacist at the West Midlands Adverse Drug
Reaction Monitoring Centre and a teaching fellow at Aston University. He
also writes a blog on drug safety at

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: contact: