mp on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:16:36 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: <nettime> Ubiquitous Commons and Stakhanov at transmediale in

On 21/01/15 18:06, allan siegel wrote:

>      A good start would be to define ?commons?. The fuziness about the
>      commons is ubiquitous, not the commons. See for a proposal:

Commons are as common(er)s do. Emerging from the bottom up, in their
particularity they cannot be defined from the top down generally, but --
to get a conceptual handle for the purposes of federating or other
inter-commons organisation -- can be analysed in terms of their
architecture of social relations with regard to things, or, as it were,
their property rights; e.g:


#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info:
#  archive: contact: